Suppr超能文献

单节段腰椎间盘突出症全内镜下椎板间椎间盘切除术的临床结果:至少5年随访

Clinical Outcome of Full-endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy for Single-level Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Minimum of 5-year Follow-up.

作者信息

Tu Zhiming, Li Ya Wei, Wang Bing, Lu Guohua, Li Lei, Kuang Lei, Dai Yuliang

机构信息

Second Xiangya Hospital, China.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):E425-E430.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Full-endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (FEID) is widely applied for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and satisfactory short-term outcomes have been achieved. However, the long-term evaluation for this technique is still lacking, especially the comparison between FEID and microendoscopic discectomy (MED).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical outcome of FEID technique in comparison with MED for single-level LDH with a minimum of 5-year follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Inpatient surgery center.

METHODS

A total of 152 patients with single-level LDH located at either L4-L5 or L5-S1 who underwent either FEID or MED from August 2008 to April 2011 at our hospital were enrolled in this study. General parameters including operative time, length of hospital stay, mean time to return to work, complications, and recurrences were recorded. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) for low back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional assessment, and modified MacNab criteria for patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, the VAS of leg and back pain decreased from 7.6 ± 1.6 and 3.1 ± 2.2 points preoperatively to 1.6 ± 1.2 and 1.7 ± 0.9 at the final follow-up, respectively (P < 0.05). The ODI score was 69.5% ± 10.5% preoperatively, and declined to 21.8% ± 7.0% at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). VAS, ODI, and modified MacNab criteria of the FEID group were improved compared to the control group though there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups.

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective study with a relatively small sample size. Additionally, this study contained only clinical outcomes, without long-term radiological outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of FEID achieved similar satisfactory long-term clinical outcomes for the surgical treatment of LDH as MED. However, compared with MED, FEID exhibits advantages including less operation time, shorter hospital stay, and faster postoperative recovery.Key words: Lumbar disc herniation, full-endoscopic interlaminar discectomy, microendoscopic disectomy, long-term.

摘要

背景

全内镜下椎板间椎间盘切除术(FEID)广泛应用于腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的治疗,并取得了满意的短期疗效。然而,该技术的长期评估仍然缺乏,尤其是FEID与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术(MED)之间的比较。

目的

比较FEID技术与MED治疗单节段LDH并至少随访5年的临床疗效。

研究设计

回顾性研究。

研究地点

住院手术中心。

方法

纳入2008年8月至2011年4月在我院接受FEID或MED治疗的152例单节段LDH患者,病变节段为L4-L5或L5-S1。记录手术时间、住院时间、平均恢复工作时间、并发症及复发情况等一般参数。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估腰腿痛程度,采用Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评估功能状况,采用改良MacNab标准评估患者满意度。

结果

末次随访时,腿痛和腰痛的VAS评分分别从术前的7.6±1.6分和3.1±2.2分降至末次随访时的1.6±1.2分和1.7±0.9分(P<0.05)。术前ODI评分为69.5%±10.5%,末次随访时降至21.8%±7.0%(P<0.05)。FEID组的VAS、ODI及改良MacNab标准较对照组有所改善,但两组间差异无统计学意义。

局限性

本研究为回顾性研究,样本量相对较小。此外,本研究仅包含临床疗效,未涉及长期影像学疗效。

结论

FEID应用于LDH手术治疗的长期临床疗效与MED相似。然而,与MED相比,FEID具有手术时间短、住院时间短和术后恢复快等优势。

关键词

腰椎间盘突出症;全内镜下椎板间椎间盘切除术;显微内镜下椎间盘切除术;长期

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验