Takase-Minegishi Kaoru, Horita Nobuyuki, Kobayashi Kouji, Yoshimi Ryusuke, Kirino Yohei, Ohno Shigeru, Kaneko Takeshi, Nakajima Hideaki, Wakefield Richard J, Emery Paul
Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Yokohama City University Medical Center.
Department of Pulmonology.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Jan 1;57(1):49-58. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex036.
To evaluate diagnostic test accuracy of US compared with MRI for the detection of synovitis in RA patients.
A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection databases. Studies evaluating the diagnostic test accuracy of US for synovitis detected by MRI as the reference standard for wrist, MCP, PIP and knee joints were included. To assess the overall accuracy, we calculated the diagnostic odds ratio using a DerSimonian-Laird random effects model and the area under the curve (AUC) for the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics using Holling's proportional hazards models. The summary estimate of the sensitivity and specificity were obtained using the bivariate model.
Fourteen of 601 identified articles were included in the review. The diagnostic odds ratio was 11.6 (95% CI 5.6, 24; I2 = 0%), 28 (95% CI 12, 66; I2 = 11%), 23 (95% CI 6.5, 84; I2 = 19%) and 5.3 (95% CI 0.60, 48; I2 = 0%) and the AUC was 0.81, 0.91, 0.91 and 0.61 for wrist, MCP, PIP and knee joints, respectively. The summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were 0.73 (95% CI 0.51, 0.87)/0.78 (95% CI 0.46, 0.94), 0.64 (95% CI 0.43, 0.81)/0.93 (95% CI 0.88, 0.97), 0.71 (95% CI 0.33, 0.93)/0.94 (95% CI 0.89, 0.97) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.56, 0.99)/0.60 (95% CI 0.20, 0.90) for wrist, MCP, PIP and knee joints, respectively.
US is a valid and reproducible technique for detecting synovitis in the wrist and finger joints. It may be considered for routine use as part of the standard diagnostic tools in RA.
评估超声(US)与磁共振成像(MRI)相比,在类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中检测滑膜炎的诊断试验准确性。
在PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和科学网核心合集数据库中进行了系统的文献检索。纳入了以MRI检测滑膜炎作为腕关节、掌指关节(MCP)、近端指间关节(PIP)和膝关节滑膜炎诊断试验准确性评估的研究。为评估总体准确性,我们使用DerSimonian-Laird随机效应模型计算诊断比值比,并使用Holling比例风险模型计算分层汇总接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。使用双变量模型获得敏感性和特异性的汇总估计值。
601篇已识别文章中的14篇纳入了本综述。腕关节、MCP、PIP和膝关节的诊断比值比分别为11.6(95%可信区间[CI] 5.6,24;I² = 0%)、28(95% CI 12,66;I² = 11%)、23(95% CI 6.5,84;I² = 19%)和5.3(95% CI 0.60,48;I² = 0%),AUC分别为0.81、0.91、0.91和0.61。腕关节、MCP、PIP和膝关节敏感性和特异性的汇总估计值分别为0.73(95% CI 0.51,0.87)/0.78(95% CI 0.46,0.94)、0.64(95% CI 0.43,0.81)/0.93(95% CI 0.88,0.97)、0.71(95% CI 0.33,0.93)/0.94(95% CI 0.89,0.97)和0.91(95% CI 0.56,0.99)/0.60(95% CI 0.20,0.90)。
超声是检测腕关节和手指关节滑膜炎的一种有效且可重复的技术。它可被视为类风湿关节炎标准诊断工具的一部分用于常规使用。