Willems Mariël, Hilgenkamp Thessa I M, Havik Else, Waninge Aly, Melville Craig A
Research Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanzehogeschool Groningen, P.O. Box 3109, 9701 DC Groningen, The Netherlands.
Intellectual Disability Medicine, Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Jan;60:256-268. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
People with intellectual disabilities (ID) experience more health problems and have different lifestyle change needs, compared with the general population.
To improve lifestyle change interventions for people with ID, this review examined how behaviour change techniques (BCTs) were applied in interventions aimed at physical activity, nutrition or physical activity and nutrition, and described their quality.
After a broad search and detailed selection process, 45 studies were included in the review. For coding BCTs, the CALO-RE taxonomy was used. To assess the quality of the interventions, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was used. Extracted data included general study characteristics and intervention characteristics.
All interventions used BCTs, although theory-driven BCTs were rarely used. The most frequently used BCTs were 'provide information on consequences of behaviour in general' and 'plan social support/social change'. Most studies were of low quality and a theoretical framework was often missing.
This review shows that BCTs are frequently applied in lifestyle change interventions. To further improve effectiveness, these lifestyle change interventions could benefit from using a theoretical framework, a detailed intervention description and an appropriate and reliable intervention design which is tailored to people with ID.
与普通人群相比,智障人士存在更多健康问题,且有不同的生活方式改变需求。
为改善针对智障人士的生活方式改变干预措施,本综述考察了行为改变技术(BCTs)在针对体育活动、营养或体育活动与营养的干预措施中的应用方式,并描述了其质量。
经过广泛检索和详细筛选过程,45项研究纳入本综述。对于BCTs编码,使用了CALO-RE分类法。为评估干预措施的质量,使用了物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)量表。提取的数据包括一般研究特征和干预特征。
所有干预措施均使用了BCTs,尽管很少使用理论驱动的BCTs。最常使用的BCTs是“提供一般行为后果的信息”和“规划社会支持/社会变革”。大多数研究质量较低,且往往缺少理论框架。
本综述表明,BCTs在生活方式改变干预措施中经常应用。为进一步提高有效性,这些生活方式改变干预措施可受益于使用理论框架、详细的干预描述以及针对智障人士量身定制的适当且可靠的干预设计。