Suppr超能文献

血管内主动脉瘤修复术后主动脉颈部直径的变化。

Change in Aortic Neck Diameter after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

作者信息

Kret Marcus R, Tran Kenneth, Lee Jason T

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.

Division of Vascular Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Aug;43:115-120. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.11.013. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implications of aortic neck dilatation following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are unclear. Previous studies are limited to comparisons of individual, early generation devices. We compared aortic neck dilatation among contemporary stent grafts.

METHODS

We reviewed preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic angiograms for EVARs performed from 2008-2014. Images were analyzed using 3-dimensional centerline reconstructions. Aortic neck diameter was measured in orthogonal planes at and 10 mm below the lowest renal artery. Device type and main body graft diameter were obtained from operative reports.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients were analyzed with a median radiologic follow-up of 21.9 months (range: 4-64). Stent grants implanted included 26 Cook Zenith, 26 Gore Excluder, 22 Medtronic Endurant, 10 Endologix Powerlink, and 2 Trivascular Ovation devices. Mean device oversizing was 13.6 ± 11.5% and did not vary by device type (P = 0.54). Most patients (86.0%) experienced increases in aortic neck diameter during follow-up, with a mean increase of 1.3 ± 2.2 mm (5.9 ± 9.3%) and 3.3 ± 0.6 mm (8.9 ± 2.5%) at 30 day and latest follow-up scans, respectively. Repeated-measures analysis further demonstrated a significant increase in mean neck dilatation during follow-up (P < 0.001). Neck dilatation was not significantly different across different devices (P = 0.233). However, there was a moderate positive correlation between percent change in neck diameter and degree of oversizing, which was statistically significant (r = 0.41, P < 0.001). Type Ia endoleak was observed in 2 patients and was associated with greater mean neck dilatation (8.8 ± 3.3 mm vs. 3.35 ± 2.71, P = 0.041). There was no relationship between changes in neck diameter and sac regression/expansion.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic neck diameter increases consistently over time following EVAR. The degree of neck dilatation correlates with degree of device oversize but not with device type.

摘要

背景

血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)后主动脉颈部扩张的影响尚不清楚。以往的研究仅限于对个别早期一代器械的比较。我们比较了当代支架型人工血管之间的主动脉颈部扩张情况。

方法

我们回顾了2008年至2014年期间接受EVAR治疗患者的术前和术后计算机断层血管造影图像。使用三维中心线重建技术对图像进行分析。在最低肾动脉水平及其下方10毫米处的正交平面上测量主动脉颈部直径。器械类型和主体移植物直径从手术报告中获取。

结果

对86例患者进行了分析,影像学随访的中位时间为21.9个月(范围:4 - 64个月)。植入的支架型人工血管包括26个库克Zenith、26个戈尔Excluder、22个美敦力Endurant、10个Endologix Powerlink和2个Trivascular Ovation器械。平均器械尺寸过大率为13.6 ± 11.5%,且不因器械类型而异(P = 0.54)。大多数患者(86.0%)在随访期间主动脉颈部直径增加,在30天和最新随访扫描时,平均增加分别为1.3 ± 2.2毫米(5.9 ± 9.3%)和3.3 ± 0.6毫米(8.9 ± 2.5%)。重复测量分析进一步表明随访期间平均颈部扩张有显著增加(P < 0.001)。不同器械之间的颈部扩张无显著差异(P = 0.233)。然而,颈部直径变化百分比与尺寸过大程度之间存在中度正相关,具有统计学意义(r = 0.41,P < 0.001)。2例患者观察到Ia型内漏,且与更大的平均颈部扩张相关(8.8 ± 3.3毫米对3.35 ± 2.71毫米,P = 0.041)。颈部直径变化与瘤腔缩小/扩大之间无相关性。

结论

EVAR术后主动脉颈部直径随时间持续增加。颈部扩张程度与器械尺寸过大程度相关,但与器械类型无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验