Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, 531 S. College Avenue, 152 Townsend Hall, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Sep 1;593-594:134-143. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.097. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
Incorporation of silica-rich rice husk residue into flooded paddy soil decreases arsenic uptake by rice. However, the impact of this practice on soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and elemental cycling is unresolved particularly as amended soils experience recurrent flooding and drying cycles. We evaluated the impact of pre-incubated silica-rich rice residue incorporation to soils on pore water chemistry and soil GHG fluxes (i.e., CO, CH, NO) over a flooding and drying cycle typical of flooded rice cultivation. Soils pre-incubated with rice husk had 4-fold higher pore water Si than control and 2-fold higher than soils pre-incubated with rice straw, whereas the pore water As and Fe concentrations in soils amended with pre-incubated straw and husk were unexpectedly similar (maximum ~0.85μM and ~450μM levels, respectively). Pre-incubation of residues did not affect Si but did affect the pore water levels of As and Fe compared to previous studies using fresh residues where straw amended soils had higher As and Fe in pore water. The global warming potential (GWP) of soil GHG emissions decreased in the order straw (612±76g CO-eqm)>husk (367±42gCO-eqm)>ashed husk=ashed straw (251±26 and 278±28gCO-eqm)>control (186±23gCO-eqm). The GWP increase due to pre-incubated straw amendment was due to: a) larger NO fluxes during re-flooding; b) smaller contributions from larger CH fluxes during flooded periods; and c) higher CH and CO fluxes at the onset of drainage. In contrast, the GWP of the husk amendment was dominated by CO and CH emissions during flooded and drainage periods, while ashed amendments increased CO emissions particularly during drainage. This experiment shows that ashed residues and husk addition minimizes GWP of flooded soils and enhances pore water Si compared to straw addition even after pre-incubation.
将富含硅的稻壳残渣掺入淹水稻田土壤中会降低水稻对砷的吸收。然而,这种做法对土壤温室气体(GHG)排放和元素循环的影响尚不清楚,特别是因为改良后的土壤会经历反复的淹水和干燥循环。我们评估了在典型淹水水稻种植过程中经历淹水和干燥循环时,预先孵育富含硅的稻壳残渣掺入土壤对孔隙水化学和土壤 GHG 通量(即 CO、CH、NO)的影响。用稻壳预先孵育的土壤的孔隙水 Si 比对照高 4 倍,比用稻秸预先孵育的土壤高 2 倍,而用预先孵育的稻秸和稻壳改良的土壤中孔隙水 As 和 Fe 的浓度却出人意料地相似(最高分别约为 0.85μM 和 450μM)。与以前使用新鲜残渣的研究相比,残渣的预孵育并没有影响 Si,但却影响了 As 和 Fe 的孔隙水水平,而以前的研究中,稻草改良的土壤中孔隙水中的 As 和 Fe 更高。土壤 GHG 排放的全球变暖潜势(GWP)的顺序为稻草(612±76g CO-eqm)>稻壳(367±42gCO-eqm)>稻壳灰=稻秸灰(251±26 和 278±28gCO-eqm)>对照(186±23gCO-eqm)。由于预孵育的稻草改良而导致的 GWP 增加,是由于:a)重新淹水时更大的 NO 通量;b)淹水期间更大的 CH 通量的贡献较小;c)排水开始时 CH 和 CO 通量较高。相比之下,稻壳改良的 GWP 主要由淹水和排水期间的 CO 和 CH 排放决定,而灰化改良则特别增加了排水期间的 CO 排放。本实验表明,与添加稻草相比,即使经过预孵育,添加灰化残渣和稻壳可以最小化淹水土壤的 GWP,并增加孔隙水中的 Si。