Kim Taehoon, Chung Jong-Won, Jang Myung Suk, Yang Mi Hwa, Lee Sang-Hwa, Kim Beom Joon, Han Moon-Ku, Kim Jae Hyoung, Jung Cheolkyu, Lim Jae-Sung, Bae Hee-Joon
College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 Jul;26(7):1528-1534. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.02.037. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
This study aimed to investigate whether fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging hyperintensity can be used as a surrogate marker for the severity of ischemic insult and predict lesion growth.
Based on a prospective stroke registry database, we identified patients with ischemic stroke who were treated with endovascular treatment (EVT) within 8 hours of onset and achieved successful recanalization (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2B). FLAIR hyperintensity was measured using the signal intensity ratio (SIR), defined as the mean SIR of diffusion-restricted lesions to the corresponding areas in the contralateral hemisphere. Lesion growth was defined as the ratio of final infarct volume on follow-up FLAIR to initial infarct volume on diffusion-weighted imaging.
For 69 patients meeting the eligibility criteria, the median FLAIR SIR was 1.17 (interquartile range, 1.08-1.23) and the median lesion growth ratio was 1.70 (interquartile range, 1.35-2.79) (Pearson's r = -.146, P = .231). In multiple linear regression models, the FLAIR SIR was not significantly correlated with the lesion growth ratio. Interestingly, the time interval from initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to successful recanalization was independently correlated with the lesion growth ratio (β = .072, P < .001). With respect to clinical outcomes, the FLAIR SIR was not associated with either discharge modified Rankin scale score ≤2 (β = -3.41, P = .30) or symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (β = 2.75; P = .63).
Contrary to our hypothesis, FLAIR hyperintensity on initial MRI before EVT was not associated with lesion growth in patients who were recanalized successfully with EVT. Instead, our results suggest that time interval from MRI acquisition to recanalization is an independent predictor of lesion growth.
本研究旨在探讨液体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)成像高信号是否可作为缺血性损伤严重程度的替代标志物,并预测病变生长。
基于前瞻性卒中登记数据库,我们确定了在发病8小时内接受血管内治疗(EVT)且实现成功再通(改良脑梗死溶栓分级≥2B)的缺血性卒中患者。使用信号强度比(SIR)测量FLAIR高信号,SIR定义为扩散受限病变的平均SIR与对侧半球相应区域的比值。病变生长定义为随访FLAIR上最终梗死体积与扩散加权成像上初始梗死体积的比值。
对于69例符合纳入标准的患者,FLAIR SIR的中位数为1.17(四分位间距,1.08 - 1.23),病变生长比的中位数为1.70(四分位间距,1.35 - 2.79)(Pearson相关系数r = -0.146,P = 0.231)。在多元线性回归模型中,FLAIR SIR与病变生长比无显著相关性。有趣的是,从初始磁共振成像(MRI)到成功再通的时间间隔与病变生长比独立相关(β = 0.072,P < 0.001)。关于临床结局,FLAIR SIR与出院时改良Rankin量表评分≤2(β = -3.41,P = 0.30)或症状性出血转化均无关(β = 2.75;P = 0.63)。
与我们的假设相反,在接受EVT成功再通的患者中,EVT前初始MRI上的FLAIR高信号与病变生长无关。相反,我们的结果表明,从MRI采集到再通的时间间隔是病变生长的独立预测因素。