Suppr超能文献

使用艾伯塔婴儿运动量表进行的现场与家庭视频观察之间的同时效度

Concurrent Validity Between Live and Home Video Observations Using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale.

作者信息

Boonzaaijer Marike, van Dam Ellen, van Haastert Ingrid C, Nuysink Jacqueline

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy (Ms Boonzaaijer and Dr Nuysink), Institute for Human Movement Studies, Research Center for Innovation in Healthcare, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Neonatology (Dr van Haastert), Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Department of Rehabilitation (Ms van Dam), Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Pediatr Phys Ther. 2017 Apr;29(2):146-151. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000363.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Serial assessment of gross motor development of infants at risk is an established procedure in neonatal follow-up clinics. Assessments based on home video recordings could be a relevant addition.

METHODS

In 48 infants (1.5-19 months), the concurrent validity of 2 applications was examined using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale: (1) a home video made by parents and (2) simultaneous observation on-site by a pediatric physical therapist. Parents' experiences were explored using a questionnaire.

RESULTS

The intraclass correlation coefficient agreement between live and home video assessment was 0.99, with a standard error of measurement of 1.41 items. Intra- and interrater reliability: intraclass correlation coefficients were more than 0.99. According to 94% of the parents, recording their infant's movement repertoire was easy to perform.

CONCLUSION

Assessing the Alberta Infant Motor Scale based on home video recordings is comparable to assessment by live observation. The video method is a promising application that can be used with low burden for parents and infants.

摘要

目的

对高危婴儿的粗大运动发育进行系列评估是新生儿随访诊所的既定程序。基于家庭录像的评估可能是一种相关补充。

方法

在48名婴儿(1.5至19个月)中,使用艾伯塔婴儿运动量表检查了两种评估方式的同时效度:(1)父母制作的家庭录像,以及(2)儿科物理治疗师在现场的同步观察。通过问卷调查探索了父母的体验。

结果

现场评估与家庭录像评估之间的组内相关系数一致性为0.99,测量标准误差为1.41项。评分者内和评分者间信度:组内相关系数均大于0.99。94%的父母表示,记录婴儿的运动技能很容易操作。

结论

基于家庭录像评估艾伯塔婴儿运动量表与现场观察评估相当。录像方法是一种很有前景的应用,对父母和婴儿的负担较小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5a0/5374751/8211cc0fdc27/ppyty-29-146-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验