Benfante Alida, Messina Riccardo, Milazzo Vito, Scichilone Nicola
Dipartimento Biomedico di Medicina Interna e Specialistica, Università Degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy; Istituto Euro-Mediterraneo di Scienza e Tecnologia, Palermo, Italy.
Società Italiana di Medicina Generale e Delle Cure Primarie (SIMG), Sezione Trapani, Alcamo, Italy.
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jun;44:106-110. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
Asthma and COPD are under-diagnosed and undertreated in adult populations, mainly due to the discrepancy between guideline recommendations and clinicians' practices. One of the reasons of this discrepancy is the difficulty encountered in real life in sharing the management of chronic respiratory diseases between general practitioners (GPs) and respiratory physicians.
An explorative, population-based investigation was performed to test whether, and to what extent, an active collaboration between GPs and pulmonologists increases the diagnosis and proper treatment of chronic obstructive airway diseases. The "COPD action" involved an in-house intervention by pulmonologists who trained GPs on how to diagnose the disease and interpret the spirometry, yielding a final agreed diagnosis.
A total of 210 subjects (M/F: 156/54; age: 62.5 ± 13.8, mean ± SD) were consecutively invited by 20 GPs and classified in a) healthy, b) symptomatic with no airway obstruction, and 3) affected by chronic respiratory diseases. 11% of previously defined "healthy" subjects were diagnosed with COPD, and symptomatic subjects were diagnosed with asthma (20%) or COPD (23%). In addition, in those who already carried a diagnosis of chronic respiratory diseases as judged by GPs, the diagnosis of COPD decreased significantly after respiratory specialist intervention (p = 0.001), in favor of asthma and chronic bronchitis. Furthermore, following the clinical and lung function assessments performed by the respiratory physicians, changes in inhaled treatments were statistically significant for each therapeutic category (test-retest reliability: r = 0.42; p < 0.001).
In conclusion, the collaboration between GPs and pulmonologists based on a pro-active approach to the individuals attending the primary care offices followed by an in-house intervention by specialists may largely improve the diagnosis and management of chronic respiratory diseases.
哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)在成年人群中诊断不足且治疗不充分,主要原因是指南建议与临床医生的实际操作存在差异。这种差异的原因之一是在现实生活中,全科医生(GP)和呼吸内科医生在慢性呼吸道疾病管理方面难以协同。
开展了一项基于人群的探索性调查,以测试全科医生和肺科医生之间的积极合作是否以及在多大程度上能提高慢性阻塞性气道疾病的诊断和合理治疗。“COPD行动”包括肺科医生在内部进行干预,培训全科医生如何诊断该疾病并解读肺功能测定结果,从而得出最终一致的诊断。
20名全科医生连续邀请了总共210名受试者(男/女:156/54;年龄:62.5±13.8,均值±标准差),并将其分为a)健康组、b)有症状但无气道阻塞组和c)患有慢性呼吸道疾病组。之前定义为“健康”的受试者中有11%被诊断为COPD,有症状的受试者被诊断为哮喘(20%)或COPD(23%)。此外,在全科医生判断已患有慢性呼吸道疾病的患者中,经过呼吸专科医生干预后,COPD的诊断显著下降(p = 0.001),转而倾向于哮喘和慢性支气管炎。此外,在呼吸内科医生进行临床和肺功能评估后,每种治疗类别的吸入治疗变化具有统计学意义(重测信度:r = 0.42;p < 0.001)。
总之,全科医生和肺科医生之间基于对基层医疗诊所就诊个体采取积极方法并随后由专科医生进行内部干预的合作,可能在很大程度上改善慢性呼吸道疾病的诊断和管理。