Coiro Stefano, Huttin Olivier, Bozec Erwan, Selton-Suty Christine, Lamiral Zohra, Carluccio Erberto, Trinh Annie, Fraser Alan G, Ambrosio Giuseppe, Rossignol Patrick, Zannad Faiez, Girerd Nicolas
INSERM CHU de Nancy, Institut Lorrain du cœur et des vaisseaux, 4 Rue du Morvan, 54500, Vandoeuvre lès Nancy, France.
Division of Cardiology, Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Sep;33(9):1361-1369. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1117-z. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
Global peak systolic longitudinal strain (PLS) derived from speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) is a widely used left ventricular deformation parameter. Modern ultrasound systems with improved temporal resolution and new software now allow automated multilayer analysis; however, there is limited evidence regarding its reproducibility. We performed intra- and inter-observer analyses within a population-based cohort study using conventional quantitative strain analysis (GE Healthcare). Fifty patients (49 ± 14 years) were randomly selected among the fourth visit of the STANISLAS Cohort. Multilayer PLS (transmural, subendocardial, and subepicardial), and strain rate (peak systolic, early and late diastolic) were evaluated. Peak systolic shortening (PSS) and early positive systolic strain (EPS) were calculated, as well as post-systolic index (PSI) and pre-stretch index (PST), two additional strain-derived parameters. Intra-observer intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were >0.75 for all analyzed parameters. The mean relative intra-observer differences were <5% for all considered parameters, and their 1.96 SDs were <15% for multilayer PLS, strain rate and PSS, but not for EPS, PSI and PST. Inter-observer ICCs were >0.70 (the majority being >0.80). The mean relative inter-observer differences were <7.5% for all considered parameters, with 1.96 SDs of relative differences being <21% for multilayer PLS, strain rate and PSS, but not for EPS, PSI and PST. In this population-based study, in subjects without or with a limited number of cardiovascular risk factors and no previous cardiovascular events, deformation parameters were found to be highly reproducible, except for EPS, PSI and PST, which showed moderately higher variability. Quantitative strain analysis appears to be an effective clinical and research tool, providing insights regarding longitudinal deformation using a simple three-step post-processing procedure.
基于斑点追踪超声心动图(STE)得出的全球峰值收缩期纵向应变(PLS)是一种广泛应用的左心室变形参数。具有更高时间分辨率的现代超声系统和新软件现在允许进行自动多层分析;然而,关于其可重复性的证据有限。我们在一项基于人群的队列研究中,使用传统定量应变分析(GE医疗)进行了观察者内和观察者间分析。在STANISLAS队列的第四次访视中随机选取了50名患者(49±14岁)。评估了多层PLS(透壁、心内膜下和心外膜下)以及应变率(峰值收缩期、舒张早期和晚期)。计算了峰值收缩期缩短率(PSS)和早期正性收缩期应变(EPS),以及另外两个应变衍生参数——收缩期后指数(PSI)和预拉伸指数(PST)。所有分析参数的观察者内组内相关系数(ICC)均>0.75。所有考虑参数的观察者内平均相对差异<5%,多层PLS、应变率和PSS的1.96倍标准差<15%,但EPS、PSI和PST并非如此。观察者间ICC>0.70(大多数>0.80)。所有考虑参数的观察者间平均相对差异<7.5%,多层PLS、应变率和PSS的相对差异的1.96倍标准差<21%,但EPS、PSI和PST并非如此。在这项基于人群的研究中,在没有或仅有有限数量心血管危险因素且无既往心血管事件的受试者中,除EPS、PSI和PST显示出中等程度更高的变异性外,变形参数具有高度可重复性。定量应变分析似乎是一种有效的临床和研究工具,通过简单的三步后处理程序提供有关纵向变形的见解。