Garijo Jacobo Moreno, Wijeysundera Duminda N, Munro Jo Carroll, Meineri Massimiliano
Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017 Jun;31(3):973-979. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
To assess the feasibility and reliability of transthoracic echocardiography to measure inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter variation using a transhepatic view.
Prospective cohort study.
Single-center hospital.
Forty consecutive patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.
Bedside transthoracic echocardiography.
Correlation between the two views was measured using Pearson R, while agreement was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). In a nested sub-study of 16 randomly selected participants, all images were re-rated by the same rater, who was blinded to the original measurement results, and by a second blinded operator. Correlation between the subcostal and transhepatic views was moderate when assessing maximum (R 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.68), and minimum (R 0.55; CI, 0.29-0.74) IVC diameter. Correlation when measuring IVC diameter variation was higher (R 0.70; CI, 0.49-0.83). Agreement between the two views for IVC diameter variation measurement was substantial (ICC 0.73; CI, 0.49-0.85). Intra-rater reliability was excellent (ICC 0.95-0.99).
Agreement between subcostal and transhepatic views was substantial for the assessment of IVC diameter variation; however, the magnitude of agreement was less than anticipated. Further research is needed to determine if the transhepatic view can be used reliably in the assessment of fluid responsiveness.
评估经胸超声心动图使用经肝视图测量下腔静脉(IVC)直径变化的可行性和可靠性。
前瞻性队列研究。
单中心医院。
40例连续接受择期心脏手术的患者。
床旁经胸超声心动图检查。
使用Pearson R测量两种视图之间的相关性,同时使用组内相关系数(ICC)测量一致性。在一项对16名随机选择参与者的嵌套子研究中,所有图像由同一名对原始测量结果不知情的评估者以及第二名不知情的操作者重新评级。在评估IVC最大直径(R 0.46;95%置信区间[CI],0.18 - 0.68)和最小直径(R 0.55;CI,0.29 - 0.74)时,肋下视图与经肝视图之间的相关性为中等。测量IVC直径变化时的相关性更高(R 0.70;CI,0.49 - 0.83)。两种视图在测量IVC直径变化方面的一致性较高(ICC 0.73;CI,0.49 - 0.85)。评估者内可靠性极佳(ICC 0.95 - 0.99)。
肋下视图与经肝视图在评估IVC直径变化方面具有较高的一致性;然而,一致程度低于预期。需要进一步研究以确定经肝视图是否可可靠用于评估液体反应性。