School of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Zografos Campus, Athens 15780, Greece.
School of Mineral Resources Engineering, Technical University of Crete, Chania, Crete 73100, Greece.
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Oct 1;595:13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.251. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
In the present paper, a life cycle assessment (LCA) study regarding pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) cultivation in Aegina island, Greece, was performed to evaluate the energy use footprint and the associated environmental impacts. In this context, a detailed life cycle inventory was created based on site-survey data and used for a holistic cradle-to-farm gate LCA analysis using the GaBi 6.5 software. The main impact categories assessed were acidification potential (AP), eutrophication potential (EP), global warming potential (GWP), ozone depletion potential (ODP), photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP) and cumulative energy demand (CED). In order to reveal the main environmental concerns pertinent to pistachio production and in turn propose measures for the reduction of environmental and energetic impacts, three scenarios were compared, namely the Baseline scenario (BS) that involves current cultivation practices, the Green Energy (GE) scenario that involves the use of biological fertilizers i.e. compost, and the Waste Utilization (WU) scenario that involves the production of biochar from pistachio and other agricultural wastes and its subsequent soil application to promote carbon sequestration and improve soil quality. Based on the results of this study, the use of compost for fertilization (GE scenario), which results in approximately 9% savings in terms of energy consumption and the five environmental impact categories studied compared to BS scenario, is considered a promising alternative cultivation strategy. Slightly higher savings (10% on average) in terms of the five calculated environmental impact categories, compared to the BS scenario, were indicated when the WU scenario was considered. Regarding energy consumption, the WU scenario results in minor increase, 3%, compared to the BS scenario. Results of uncertainty analysis performed using the Monte Carlo technique and contribution analysis showed that GE and WU scenarios offer reliable and significant eco-profile improvements for pistachio production in the study area compared to the current situation.
本研究旨在对希腊埃伊纳岛的开心果(Pistacia vera L.)种植进行生命周期评估(LCA),以评估能源足迹和相关的环境影响。为此,我们基于现场调查数据创建了详细的生命周期清单,并使用 GaBi 6.5 软件对整个从摇篮到农场门的生命周期进行了分析。评估的主要影响类别包括酸化潜力(AP)、富营养化潜力(EP)、全球变暖潜势(GWP)、臭氧消耗潜势(ODP)、光化学臭氧生成潜势(POCP)和累计能源需求(CED)。为了揭示与开心果生产相关的主要环境问题,并提出减少环境和能源影响的措施,我们比较了三个方案,即当前种植实践的基准方案(BS)、使用生物肥料(即堆肥)的绿色能源方案(GE)和利用开心果和其他农业废物生产生物炭并将其施用于土壤以促进碳固存和改善土壤质量的废物利用方案(WU)。根据本研究的结果,与 BS 方案相比,使用堆肥进行施肥(GE 方案)可节省约 9%的能源消耗和五个研究环境影响类别,被认为是一种有前途的替代种植策略。当考虑 WU 方案时,与 BS 方案相比,在五个计算出的环境影响类别中,略高的节约(平均 10%)。与 BS 方案相比,WU 方案的能源消耗略有增加,增加了 3%。使用蒙特卡罗技术和贡献分析进行的不确定性分析结果表明,与当前情况相比,GE 和 WU 方案为研究区域的开心果生产提供了可靠且显著的生态效益改进。