Qureshi Adnan I, Chaudhry Saqib A, Eckstein Henning, Jansen Olav, Ringleb Peter A
Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Institute, St. Cloud, Minnesota.
Department of Neur-ology and Ophthalmology, Michigan State University, Lansing, Michigan.
Neurosurgery. 2017 Sep 1;81(3):531-536. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx092.
Extracranial vertebral artery disease is seen in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis, although the clinical significance is not well understood.
To determine the prevalence and natural history of extracranial vertebral artery disease in patients with recently symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis.
We analyzed data collected for patients with recently symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis in the Stent-Protected Angioplasty vs Carotid Endarterectomy trial. We used Cox proportional hazards analysis to compare the relative risk of various endpoints (any stroke, ipsilateral stroke, and death) between the 3 categories of extracranial vertebral artery disease (normal/hypoplastic, moderate/severe stenosis, occlusion) adjusting for age, gender, severity of internal carotid artery stenosis at baseline (<70% and ≥70%), allocated procedure (carotid angioplasty and stent placement or carotid endarterectomy) and hypertension.
Moderate to severe stenosis and occlusion of 1 of both extracranial vertebral arteries were diagnosed in 152 (12.9%) and 57 (4.8%) of 1181 subjects, respectively. Comparing subjects with normal or hypoplastic vertebral artery, there was nonsignificant 30%, 40%, and 50% higher risk of any stroke (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7-2.3), ipsilateral stroke (HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.7-2.5), and death (HR 1.5, 95% CI 0.7-3.1) among subjects with moderate to severe vertebral artery stenosis after adjusting for potential confounders.
There may be an increased risk of stroke and death in patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis with concurrent asymptomatic extracranial vertebral artery stenosis.
尽管颅外椎动脉疾病的临床意义尚未完全明确,但在颈内动脉狭窄患者中较为常见。
确定近期有症状的颈内动脉狭窄患者颅外椎动脉疾病的患病率及自然病史。
我们分析了在支架保护血管成形术与颈动脉内膜切除术试验中收集的近期有症状的颈内动脉狭窄患者的数据。我们使用Cox比例风险分析,比较颅外椎动脉疾病的3种类型(正常/发育不全、中度/重度狭窄、闭塞)之间各种终点事件(任何卒中、同侧卒中和死亡)的相对风险,并对年龄、性别、基线时颈内动脉狭窄的严重程度(<70%和≥70%)、分配的治疗方法(颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术或颈动脉内膜切除术)和高血压进行校正。
在1181名受试者中,分别有152名(12.9%)和57名(4.8%)被诊断为一侧颅外椎动脉中度至重度狭窄和闭塞。与椎动脉正常或发育不全的受试者相比