Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Pain Med. 2018 Jul 1;19(7):1396-1407. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx044.
State prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) can help detect individuals with multiple provider episodes (MPEs; also referred to as doctor/pharmacy shopping), an indicator of prescription drug abuse and/or diversion. Although unsolicited reporting by PDMPs to prescribers of opioid analgesics is thought to be an important practice in reducing MPEs and the potential harm associated with them, evidence of its effectiveness is mixed. This exploratory research evaluates the impact of unsolicited reports sent by Massachusetts' PDMP to the prescribers of persons with MPEs.
Individuals with MPEs were identified from PDMP records between January 2010 and July 2011 as individuals having Schedule II prescriptions (at least one prescription being an opioid) from four or more distinct prescribers and four or more distinct pharmacies within six months. Based on available MA-PDMP resources, an unsolicited report containing the patient's 12-month prescription history was sent to prescribers of a subset of patients who met the MPE threshold; a comparison group closely matched on demographics and baseline prescription history, whose prescribers were not sent a report, was generated using propensity score matching. The prescription history of each group was examined for 12 months before and after the intervention.
There were eighty-four patients (intervention group) whose prescribers received an unsolicited report and 504 matched patients (comparison group) whose prescribers were not sent a report. Regression analyses indicated significantly greater decreases in the number of Schedule II opioid prescriptions (P < 0.01), number of prescribers visited (P < 0.01), number of pharmacies used (P < 0.01), dosage units (P < 0.01), total days' supply (P < 0.01), total morphine milligram equivalents (MME; P < 0.01), and average daily MME (P < 0.05) for the intervention group relative to the comparison group. A post hoc analysis suggested that the observed intervention effects were greater for individuals with an average daily dose of less than 100 MMEs.
This study suggests that PDMP unsolicited reporting to prescribers can help reduce risk measures in patients' prescription histories, which may improve health outcomes for patients receiving opioid analgesics from multiple providers.
州处方药物监测计划(PDMP)可帮助发现具有多重提供者就诊史(MPE;也称为医生/药店购药)的个体,这是处方药物滥用和/或转移的一个指标。尽管 PDMP 主动向阿片类镇痛药的处方医师报告被认为是减少 MPE 及其相关潜在危害的重要实践,但其实效证据参差不齐。这项探索性研究评估了马萨诸塞州 PDMP 向 MPE 患者的医师发送非邀约报告的影响。
2010 年 1 月至 2011 年 7 月,根据 PDMP 记录确定 MPE 患者,即六个月内从四位或四位以上不同的提供者和四家或四家以上不同的药店获得 II 类处方(至少一张处方为阿片类药物)的个人。根据马萨诸塞州 PDMP 的可用资源,向符合 MPE 阈值的患者的一部分患者的处方医师发送包含患者 12 个月处方史的非邀约报告;使用倾向评分匹配生成一组对照患者,这些患者在人口统计学和基线处方史上相匹配,但其处方医师未收到报告。在干预前后的 12 个月内检查了两组的处方史。
有 84 名患者(干预组)的医师收到了非邀约报告,504 名匹配患者(对照组)的医师未收到报告。回归分析表明,II 类阿片类药物处方数量(P<0.01)、就诊提供者数量(P<0.01)、使用药店数量(P<0.01)、剂量单位(P<0.01)、总供应天数(P<0.01)、总吗啡毫克当量(MME;P<0.01)和平均每日 MME(P<0.05)显著下降,与对照组相比,干预组的降幅更大。事后分析表明,对于每日平均剂量低于 100 MME 的个体,观察到的干预效果更大。
本研究表明,PDMP 向处方医师主动报告可能有助于降低患者处方史中的风险指标,这可能会改善从多位提供者处接受阿片类镇痛药的患者的健康结果。