Balaguier Romain, Madeleine Pascal, Rose-Dulcina Kévin, Vuillerme Nicolas
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, AGEIS, Grenoble, France.
Physical Activity and Human Performance group-SMI, Dept. of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 6;12(4):e0175126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175126. eCollection 2017.
The prevalence of low back disorders is dramatically high in viticulture. Field measurements that objectively quantify work exposure can provide information on the relationship between the adopted trunk postures and low back pain. The purposes of the present study were three-fold (1) to carry out a kinematics analysis of vineyard-workers' pruning activity by extracting the duration of bending and rotation of the trunk, (2) to question separately the relationship between the duration of forward bending or trunk rotation with low back pain intensity and pressure pain sensitivity and (3) to question the relationship between the combined duration of forward bending and trunk rotation on low back pain intensity and pressure pain sensitivity. Fifteen vineyard-workers were asked to perform pruning activity for 12 minutes with a wireless triaxial accelerometer placed on their trunk. Kinematic analysis of the trunk showed that vineyard-workers spent more than 50% of the time with the trunk flexed greater than 30° and more than 20% with the trunk rotated greater than 10°. These results show that pruning activity lead to the adoption of forward bended and rotated trunk postures that could significantly increase the risk of work related musculoskeletal disorders in the low back. However, this result was mitigated by the observation of an absence of significant association between the duration of forward bending and trunk rotation with low back pain intensity or pressure pain sensitivity. Even if prospective field measurements and studies assessing the effects of low back pain confounders are needed, this field study provides new genuine information on trunk kinematics during pruning activity.
在葡萄种植行业中,下背部疾病的患病率极高。能够客观量化工作暴露程度的现场测量,可以提供有关所采用的躯干姿势与下背部疼痛之间关系的信息。本研究的目的有三个:(1)通过提取躯干弯曲和旋转的持续时间,对葡萄园工人的修剪活动进行运动学分析;(2)分别探讨向前弯曲或躯干旋转的持续时间与下背部疼痛强度及压痛敏感性之间的关系;(3)探讨向前弯曲和躯干旋转的总持续时间与下背部疼痛强度及压痛敏感性之间的关系。15名葡萄园工人被要求在躯干上佩戴无线三轴加速度计,进行12分钟的修剪活动。对躯干的运动学分析表明,葡萄园工人有超过50%的时间躯干弯曲超过30°,超过20%的时间躯干旋转超过10°。这些结果表明,修剪活动会导致采用向前弯曲和旋转的躯干姿势,这可能会显著增加下背部与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病的风险。然而,通过观察发现向前弯曲和躯干旋转的持续时间与下背部疼痛强度或压痛敏感性之间不存在显著关联,这一结果得到了缓解。即使需要进行前瞻性现场测量以及评估下背部疼痛混杂因素影响的研究,但这项现场研究提供了有关修剪活动期间躯干运动学的新的真实信息。