Harith Arun Kumar, Avs Anil Kumar, Sampath Sangeetha
Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Command Hopsital (SC) , Pune, Maharashtra, India .
Professor, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Command Hopsital (SC) , Pune, Maharashtra, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Feb;11(2):BC26-BC29. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24462.9430. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
Laboratory investigations account for significant percentage of healthcare expenses. Every hospital and laboratory especially in the government sector wants to cut down the expenses on reports and offer inferior printouts of reports. The debate of printing attractive reports (clientele aspiration) Vs costs cutting (managerial issues) continues. It becomes the moral responsibility of doctors to guide the management into implementing an effective and economical option of report transcription. Cutting cost is always good but it should be achieved in an effective way keeping in mind the expectation of all the stake holders and ensuring that quality is not significantly compromised. The data regarding economics of printing available on the Internet may be market driven and not a true reflection of printing cost. The present study was undertaken to generate data on the economics of printing reports on various platforms to enable managers to make informed decision on choice of optimal printing option.
To provide practical data on economics of printing reports using various printing options available in the country.
Four printing devices (laser printer, inkjet printer, dotmatrix printer and thermal printer) were connected to the laboratory information system and the reports printed from them were critically evaluated for the following parameters - cost of stationary, printing cost, time of printing and clientele satisfaction.
The cost of printing a single report on laser printer, inkjet printer, dotmatrix printer and thermal printers was Rs 0.75, Rs 0.65, Rs 0.20 and Rs 0.93 respectively. The time taken to print 30 reports were 162 sec, 193 sec, 210 and 60 sec respectively. Clientele satisfaction scores were best with Laser and Inkjet printed reports.
The most economical mode of printing is Dot Matrix printer using DOS output for printing. However, when the workload of a laboratory is high, then the use of laser printer is not prohibitively expensive option and can be resorted to. Use of thermal printer was found to be unsatisfactory.
实验室检查占医疗保健费用的很大比例。每个医院和实验室,尤其是政府部门的,都希望削减报告费用,并提供质量较差的报告打印件。关于打印吸引人的报告(客户期望)与削减成本(管理问题)的争论仍在继续。医生有道德责任指导管理层实施一种有效且经济的报告转录方案。削减成本固然总是好事,但应以一种有效的方式实现,同时要考虑到所有利益相关者的期望,并确保质量不会受到显著影响。互联网上有关打印成本的数据可能受市场驱动,并非打印成本的真实反映。本研究旨在生成关于在各种平台上打印报告的成本数据,以使管理人员能够就最佳打印选项的选择做出明智决策。
提供关于使用国内现有各种打印选项打印报告成本的实际数据。
将四台打印设备(激光打印机、喷墨打印机、针式打印机和热敏打印机)连接到实验室信息系统,并对从它们打印出的报告在以下参数方面进行严格评估——纸张成本、打印成本、打印时间和客户满意度。
在激光打印机、喷墨打印机、针式打印机和热敏打印机上打印一份报告的成本分别为0.75卢比、0.65卢比、0.20卢比和0.93卢比。打印30份报告所需时间分别为162秒、193秒、210秒和60秒。激光和喷墨打印报告的客户满意度得分最高。
最经济的打印方式是使用DOS输出的针式打印机。然而,当实验室工作量很大时,使用激光打印机并非成本过高的选择,也可以采用。发现使用热敏打印机并不令人满意。