University of Central Florida.
J Pers. 2018 Feb;86(1):69-82. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12319. Epub 2017 May 18.
Traditional, biologically based trait theories have deservedly gained broad acceptance, but some long-standing core issues of personality research remain unresolved. Recent research questions whether (a) there can be a single universal structural model of personality superfactors, (b) current theory adequately specifies the processes that mediate behavioral and emotional expressions of traits, and (c) brain-based accounts of traits adequately explain their role in real-world functioning and adaptation. This article reviews the perspective on these issues provided by cognitive-adaptive trait theory. This theory rejects the view that personality dimensions directly reflect brain systems. Instead, traits correspond to variation in strategies for managing key adaptive challenges. Thus, each trait is expressed in environments that pose those challenges, and each trait corresponds to skills and self-knowledge that facilitate adaptation to those environments. The cognitive-adaptive theory affords novel perspectives on trait psychometrics, theoretical accounts of mediating processes, and real-world adaptation.
传统的、基于生物学的特质理论理所当然地获得了广泛的认可,但人格研究的一些长期存在的核心问题仍未得到解决。最近的研究质疑是否(a)是否可以存在单一的普遍人格超因素结构模型,(b)当前的理论是否充分说明了中介特质的行为和情绪表达的过程,以及(c)基于大脑的特质解释是否充分说明了它们在现实世界中的功能和适应中的作用。本文回顾了认知适应特质理论对这些问题的看法。该理论反对人格维度直接反映大脑系统的观点。相反,特质对应于管理关键适应挑战的策略的变化。因此,每种特质都在构成这些挑战的环境中表现出来,每种特质都对应于促进适应这些环境的技能和自我认知。认知适应理论为特质心理计量学、中介过程的理论解释以及现实世界的适应提供了新的视角。