Biancari Fausto, Dalén Magnus, Perrotti Andrea, Fiore Antonio, Reichart Daniel, Khodabandeh Sorosh, Gulbins Helmut, Zipfel Svante, Al Shakaki Mosab, Welp Henryk, Vezzani Antonella, Gherli Tiziano, Lommi Jaakko, Juvonen Tatu, Svenarud Peter, Chocron Sidney, Verhoye Jean Philippe, Bounader Karl, Gatti Giuseppe, Gabrielli Marco, Saccocci Matteo, Kinnunen Eeva-Maija, Onorati Francesco, Santarpino Giuseppe, Alkhamees Khalid, Ruggieri Vito G, Dell'Aquila Angelo M
Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Anesthesiology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 15;241:109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.120. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
The evidence of the benefits of using venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is scarce.
We analyzed the outcomes of patients who received VA-ECMO therapy due to cardiac or respiratory failure after isolated CABG in 12 centers between 2005 and 2016. Patients treated preoperatively with ECMO were excluded from this study.
VA-ECMO was employed in 148 patients after CABG for median of 5.0days (mean, 6.4, SD 5.6days). In-hospital mortality was 64.2%. Pooled in-hospital mortality was 65.9% without significant heterogeneity between the centers (I 8.6%). The proportion of VA-ECMO in each center did not affect in-hospital mortality (p=0.861). No patients underwent heart transplantation and six patients received a left ventricular assist device. Logistic regression showed that creatinine clearance (p=0.004, OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99), pulmonary disease (p=0.018, OR 4.42, 95% CI 1.29-15.15) and pre-VA-ECMO blood lactate (p=0.015, OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.18) were independent baseline predictors of in-hospital mortality. One-, 2-, and 3-year survival was 31.0%, 27.9%, and 26.1%, respectively.
One third of patients with need for VA-ECMO after CABG survive to discharge. In view of the burden of resources associated with VA-ECMO treatment and the limited number of patients surviving to discharge, further studies are needed to identify patients who may benefit the most from this treatment.
冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后使用静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)的益处证据不足。
我们分析了2005年至2016年间12个中心因孤立性CABG后心脏或呼吸衰竭接受VA-ECMO治疗的患者的结局。术前接受ECMO治疗的患者被排除在本研究之外。
148例CABG术后患者使用了VA-ECMO,中位使用时间为5.0天(平均6.4天,标准差5.6天)。住院死亡率为64.2%。汇总住院死亡率为65.9%,各中心之间无显著异质性(I² 8.6%)。各中心VA-ECMO的使用比例不影响住院死亡率(p = 0.861)。没有患者接受心脏移植,6例患者接受了左心室辅助装置。逻辑回归显示,肌酐清除率(p = 0.004,OR 0.98,95%CI 0.97 - 0.99)、肺部疾病(p = 0.018,OR 4.42,95%CI 1.29 - 15.15)和VA-ECMO前血乳酸水平(p = 0.015,OR 1.10,95%CI 1.02 - 1.18)是住院死亡率的独立基线预测因素。1年、2年和3年生存率分别为31.0%、27.9%和26.1%。
CABG后需要VA-ECMO的患者中有三分之一存活至出院。鉴于VA-ECMO治疗相关的资源负担以及存活至出院的患者数量有限,需要进一步研究以确定可能从该治疗中获益最大的患者。