Suppr超能文献

与浆液性癌相比,卵巢透明细胞癌的预后较差:来自台湾单中心的研究结果。

Clear cell carcinomas of the ovary have poorer outcomes compared with serous carcinomas: Results from a single-center Taiwanese study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Gynecologic Cancer Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Department of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Formos Med Assoc. 2018 Feb;117(2):117-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of Taiwanese patients with ovarian clear cell carcinomas (CCCs) and serous carcinomas (SCs).

METHODS

We retrieved the clinical records of women with epithelial ovarian cancer (Stage I-IV) who received primary surgeries between 2000 and 2013. Cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival, and survival after recurrence (SAR) of CCC and SC patients were retrospectively compared. Multivariate analysis was used to identify the independent predictors of survival.

RESULTS

Of 891 women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer, 169 CCCs and 351 high-grade SCs were analyzed. The 5-year CSS rates of CCC patients were significantly lower than those of SC for both Stage III (22.3% vs. 47.3%, p = 0.001) and Stage IV (0% vs. 24.4%, p = 0.001) disease. In the absence of gross residual malignancies, the 5-year CSS rate was better for CCC (82.3%) than SC (75.2%, p = 0.010). The 5-year SAR rate was significantly lower for CCC than SC (14.3% vs. 24.4%, p = 0.002). Old age and residual malignancies were independent prognostic factors for CSS in the entire cohort of CCC patients. In the subgroup of Stage I CCC, positive cytology was identified as the only adverse prognostic factor for CSS.

CONCLUSION

The clinical outcomes of CCC are generally poorer than SC. Complete cytoreduction to no gross residual disease should be ideally achieved in CCC patients. A greater understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of CCC may lead to tailored therapies, ultimately optimizing outcomes.

摘要

背景/目的:比较台湾地区卵巢透明细胞癌(CCC)和浆液性癌(SC)患者的临床结局。

方法

我们检索了 2000 年至 2013 年间接受初次手术的上皮性卵巢癌(I-IV 期)女性的临床记录。回顾性比较 CCC 和 SC 患者的癌症特异性生存(CSS)、无进展生存和复发后生存(SAR)。采用多变量分析确定生存的独立预测因素。

结果

在 891 例上皮性卵巢癌患者中,分析了 169 例 CCC 和 351 例高级别 SC。III 期(22.3%比 47.3%,p=0.001)和 IV 期(0%比 24.4%,p=0.001)疾病时,CCC 患者的 5 年 CSS 率明显低于 SC。在无大体残留肿瘤的情况下,CCC 的 5 年 CSS 率(82.3%)优于 SC(75.2%,p=0.010)。CCC 的 5 年 SAR 率明显低于 SC(14.3%比 24.4%,p=0.002)。高龄和残留肿瘤是整个 CCC 患者 CSS 的独立预后因素。在 I 期 CCC 亚组中,细胞学阳性被确定为 CSS 的唯一不良预后因素。

结论

CCC 的临床结局普遍差于 SC。CCC 患者应理想地达到完全肿瘤减灭术,无肉眼残留肿瘤。对 CCC 分子发病机制的进一步了解可能会导致制定针对性治疗方案,最终优化结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验