Watts Thomas D, Johanesen Priscilla A, Lyras Dena, Rood Julian I, Adams Vicki
Infection and Immunity Program, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Infection and Immunity Program, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Plasmid. 2017 May;91:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
Clostridium perfringens produces an extensive repertoire of toxins and extracellular enzymes, many of which are intimately involved in the progression of disease and are encoded by genes on conjugative plasmids. In addition, many C. perfringens strains can carry up to five of these conjugative toxin or antimicrobial resistance plasmids, each of which has a similar 35kb backbone. This conserved backbone includes the tcp conjugation locus and the central control region (CCR), which encodes genes involved in plasmid regulation, replication and partitioning, including a parMRC partitioning locus. Most conjugative plasmids in C. perfringens have a conserved replication protein, raising questions as to how multiple, closely related plasmids are maintained within a single strain. Bioinformatics analysis has highlighted the presence of at least 10 different parMRC partitioning system families (parMRC) in these plasmids, with differences in amino acid sequence identity between each ParM family ranging from 15% to 54%. No two plasmids that encode genes belonging to the same partitioning family have been observed in a single strain, suggesting that these families represent the basis for plasmid incompatibility. In an attempt to validate the proposed parMRC incompatibility groups, genetically marked C. perfringens plasmids encoding identical parMRC or parMRC homologues or different combinations of parMRC, parMRC and parMRC family homologues were introduced into a single strain via conjugation. The stability of each plasmid was determined using an incompatibility assay in which the plasmid profile of each strain was monitored over the course of two days in the absence of direct selection. The results showed that plasmids with identical parMRC or parMRC homologues were incompatible and could not coexist in the absence of external selection. By contrast, plasmids that encoded different parMRC homologues were compatible and could coexist in the same cell in the absence of selection, with the exception of strains housing parMRC and parMRC combinations, which showed a minor incompatibility phenotype. In conclusion, we have provided the first direct evidence of plasmid incompatibility in Clostridium spp. and have shown experimentally that the compatibility of conjugative C. perfringens plasmids correlates with the presence of parMRC-like partitioning systems of different phylogenetic subfamilies.
产气荚膜梭菌可产生大量毒素和细胞外酶,其中许多与疾病进展密切相关,且由接合质粒上的基因编码。此外,许多产气荚膜梭菌菌株可携带多达五种此类接合毒素或抗微生物耐药性质粒,每种质粒都有相似的35kb主干。这个保守的主干包括tcp接合位点和中央控制区(CCR),CCR编码参与质粒调控、复制和分配的基因,包括一个parMRC分配位点。产气荚膜梭菌中的大多数接合质粒都有一个保守的复制蛋白,这就引发了关于多个密切相关的质粒如何在单个菌株中维持的问题。生物信息学分析突出显示,这些质粒中至少存在10个不同的parMRC分配系统家族(parMRC),每个ParM家族之间的氨基酸序列同一性差异在15%至54%之间。在单个菌株中未观察到编码属于同一分配家族基因的两个质粒,这表明这些家族代表了质粒不相容性的基础。为了验证所提出的parMRC不相容性组,通过接合将编码相同parMRC或parMRC同源物或parMRC、parMRC和parMRC家族同源物不同组合的基因标记产气荚膜梭菌质粒引入单个菌株。使用不相容性测定法确定每个质粒的稳定性,在该测定法中,在没有直接选择的情况下,在两天的过程中监测每个菌株的质粒图谱。结果表明,具有相同parMRC或parMRC同源物的质粒是不相容的,在没有外部选择的情况下不能共存。相比之下,编码不同parMRC同源物的质粒是相容的,在没有选择的情况下可以在同一细胞中共存,但容纳parMRC和parMRC组合的菌株除外,这些菌株表现出轻微的不相容表型。总之,我们提供了梭菌属中质粒不相容性的首个直接证据,并通过实验表明,产气荚膜梭菌接合质粒的相容性与不同系统发育亚家族的parMRC样分配系统的存在相关。