Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Université de Montréal, 2375 chemin de la Cote-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC H3T 1A8, Canada; Universite de Montreal Public Health Research Institute (IRSPUM), Université de Montréal, 7101, Parc Ave., Montreal, QC H3N 1X7, Canada.
Ramboll Environ, 6 Davis Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Environ Int. 2017 Jul;104:118-121. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.03.023. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
An association between serum levels of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and endometriosis has recently been reported in an epidemiologic study. Oral contraceptive use to treat dysmenorrhea (pelvic pain associated with endometriosis) could potentially influence this association by reducing menstrual fluid loss, a route of excretion for PFAS. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the influence of differential oral contraceptive use on the association between PFAS and endometriosis. We used a published life-stage physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to simulate plasma levels of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) from birth to age at study participation (range 18-44years). In the simulated population, PFAS level distributions matched those for controls in the epidemiologic study. Prevalence and geometric mean duration (standard deviation [SD]) of oral contraceptive use in the simulated women were based on data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; among the women with endometriosis the values were, respectively, 29% and 6.8 (3.1) years; among those without endometriosis these values were 18% and 5.3 (2.8) years. In simulations, menstrual fluid loss (ml/cycle) in women taking oral contraceptives was assumed to be 56% of loss in non-users. We evaluated the association between simulated plasma PFAS concentration and endometriosis in the simulated population using logistic regression. Based on the simulations, the association between PFAS levels and endometriosis attributable to differential contraceptive use had an odds ratio (95% CI) of 1.05 (1.02, 1.07) for a log unit increase in PFOA and 1.03 (1.02, 1.05) for PFOS. In comparison, the epidemiologic study reported odds ratios of 1.62 (0.99, 2.66) for PFOA and 1.25 (0.87, 1.80) for PFOS. Our results suggest that the influence of oral contraceptive use on the association between PFAS levels and endometriosis is relatively small.
最近的一项流行病学研究报告称,血清中全氟烷基物质(PFAS)水平与子宫内膜异位症之间存在关联。口服避孕药用于治疗痛经(与子宫内膜异位症相关的盆腔疼痛),可能会通过减少月经血量来影响这种关联,因为月经血量是 PFAS 的一种排泄途径。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估口服避孕药使用的差异对 PFAS 与子宫内膜异位症之间关联的影响。我们使用了已发表的基于生命阶段的生理药代动力学(PBPK)模型,模拟了从出生到研究参与时的血浆全氟辛酸(PFOA)和全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)水平(范围 18-44 岁)。在模拟人群中,PFAS 水平分布与流行病学研究中的对照组相匹配。在模拟女性中,口服避孕药的使用流行率和几何平均持续时间(标准差 [SD])基于来自全国健康和营养检查调查的数据;在患有子宫内膜异位症的女性中,分别为 29%和 6.8(3.1)年;在没有子宫内膜异位症的女性中,这些值分别为 18%和 5.3(2.8)年。在模拟中,口服避孕药使用者的月经血量(ml/周期)假设为非使用者的 56%。我们使用逻辑回归评估了模拟人群中模拟血浆 PFAS 浓度与子宫内膜异位症之间的关联。基于模拟结果,由于避孕方法不同导致的 PFAS 水平与子宫内膜异位症之间的关联,PFOA 对数单位增加的优势比(95%CI)为 1.05(1.02,1.07),PFOS 为 1.03(1.02,1.05)。相比之下,该流行病学研究报告 PFOA 的优势比为 1.62(0.99,2.66),PFOS 为 1.25(0.87,1.80)。我们的结果表明,口服避孕药使用对 PFAS 水平与子宫内膜异位症之间关联的影响相对较小。