Suppr超能文献

包括神经松动技术在内的手法治疗对腕管综合征的疗效:一项随机对照试验

Efficacy of Manual Therapy Including Neurodynamic Techniques for the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Wolny Tomasz, Saulicz Edward, Linek Paweł, Shacklock Michael, Myśliwiec Andrzej

机构信息

Department of Kinesiotherapy and Special Physiotherapy Methods, the Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland.

Department of Kinesiotherapy and Special Physiotherapy Methods, the Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland.

出版信息

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017 May;40(4):263-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Apr 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this randomized trial was to compare the efficacy of manual therapy, including the use of neurodynamic techniques, with electrophysical modalities on patients with mild and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

METHODS

The study included 140 CTS patients who were randomly assigned to the manual therapy (MT) group, which included the use of neurodynamic techniques, functional massage, and carpal bone mobilizations techniques, or to the electrophysical modalities (EM) group, which included laser and ultrasound therapy. Nerve conduction, pain severity, symptom severity, and functional status measured by the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire were assessed before and after treatment. Therapy was conducted twice weekly and both groups received 20 therapy sessions.

RESULTS

A baseline assessment revealed group differences in sensory conduction of the median nerve (P < .01) but not in motor conduction (P = .82). Four weeks after the last treatment procedure, nerve conduction was examined again. In the MT group, median nerve sensory conduction velocity increased by 34% and motor conduction velocity by 6% (in both cases, P < .01). There was no change in median nerve sensory and motor conduction velocities in the EM. Distal motor latency was decreased (P < .01) in both groups. A baseline assessment revealed no group differences in pain severity, symptom severity, or functional status. Immediately after therapy, analysis of variance revealed group differences in pain severity (P < .01), with a reduction in pain in both groups (MT: 290%, P < .01; EM: 47%, P < .01). There were group differences in symptom severity (P < .01) and function (P < .01) on the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. Both groups had an improvement in functional status (MT: 47%, P < .01; EM: 9%, P < .01) and a reduction in subjective CTS symptoms (MT: 67%, P < .01; EM: 15%, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Both therapies had a positive effect on nerve conduction, pain reduction, functional status, and subjective symptoms in individuals with CTS. However, the results regarding pain reduction, subjective symptoms, and functional status were better in the MT group.

摘要

目的

本随机试验的目的是比较手法治疗(包括使用神经动力学技术)与电物理治疗方式对轻中度腕管综合征(CTS)患者的疗效。

方法

该研究纳入了140例CTS患者,他们被随机分配到手法治疗(MT)组,该组包括使用神经动力学技术、功能性按摩和腕骨松动技术,或电物理治疗方式(EM)组,该组包括激光和超声治疗。在治疗前后评估通过波士顿腕管问卷测量的神经传导、疼痛严重程度、症状严重程度和功能状态。治疗每周进行两次,两组均接受20次治疗。

结果

基线评估显示,正中神经感觉传导存在组间差异(P <.01),但运动传导无差异(P =.82)。在最后一次治疗程序四周后,再次检查神经传导。在MT组中,正中神经感觉传导速度增加了34%,运动传导速度增加了6%(两种情况均为P <.01)。EM组正中神经感觉和运动传导速度没有变化。两组的远端运动潜伏期均降低(P <.01)。基线评估显示,两组在疼痛严重程度、症状严重程度或功能状态方面没有差异。治疗后立即进行的方差分析显示,两组在疼痛严重程度方面存在组间差异(P <.01),两组疼痛均减轻(MT组:290%,P <.01;EM组:47%,P <.01)。在波士顿腕管问卷上,两组在症状严重程度(P <.01)和功能(P <.01)方面存在组间差异。两组的功能状态均有所改善(MT组:47%,P <.01;EM组:9%,P <.01),主观CTS症状均有所减轻(MT组:67%,P <.01;EM组:15%,P <.01)。

结论

两种治疗方法对CTS患者的神经传导、疼痛减轻、功能状态和主观症状均有积极影响。然而,MT组在疼痛减轻、主观症状和功能状态方面的结果更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验