Suppr超能文献

作为低级别胶质瘤多模式治疗一部分的多药联合化疗与单药化疗的治疗模式及疗效

Patterns of care and outcomes of multi-agent versus single-agent chemotherapy as part of multimodal management of low grade glioma.

作者信息

Haque Waqar, Verma Vivek, Butler E Brian, Teh Bin S

机构信息

CHI St Luke's Health, The Woodlands, TX, USA.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.

出版信息

J Neurooncol. 2017 Jun;133(2):369-375. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2443-7. Epub 2017 Apr 21.

Abstract

For high-risk low-grade gliomas (LGGs), adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) with procarbazine/lomustine/vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy increases overall survival (OS) over RT alone. However, in practice, temozolomide (TMZ) is often used instead of PCV. Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we provide the first investigation of practice patterns and outcomes of chemoradiotherapy with single-agent chemotherapy (SAC, analogous to TMZ) or multi-agent chemotherapy (MAC, analogous to PCV) for LGG. Patients with high-risk Grade II LGGs were queried in the NCDB. Inclusion was limited to patients treated with definitive RT and chemotherapy. Patients were divided into cohorts receiving SAC or MAC. Kaplan-Meier analysis compared overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards models determined variables independently associated with OS. Of 1029 patients, 989 (96.1%) received SAC, while 40 (3.9%) received MAC. Patients treated more recently (2010-2012) were less likely to receive MAC (p = 0.029). No differences in median OS were observed between patients treated with MAC and SAC (45.3 vs. 59.2 months, p = 0.861). Independent predictors of worse OS included age >40, high Charlson-Deyo index, other governmental/unrecorded insurance status, biopsy only, astrocytoma histology, Western geographical region, and higher income. Substuting MAC with SAC had no impact on OS (p = 0.804). There is a significantly greater utilization of SAC compared to MAC in the US. There were no differences in OS between patients receiving SAC and MAC, nor did this factor impact OS on multivariate analysis, suggesting that the practice of substituting MAC with SAC for management of LGG may not adversely affect outcome.

摘要

对于高危低级别胶质瘤(LGG),辅助放疗(RT)联合丙卡巴肼/洛莫司汀/长春新碱(PCV)化疗比单纯放疗可提高总生存期(OS)。然而,在实际应用中,替莫唑胺(TMZ)常被用于替代PCV。利用国家癌症数据库(NCDB),我们首次对LGG采用单药化疗(SAC,类似于TMZ)或多药化疗(MAC,类似于PCV)进行放化疗的实践模式和结果进行了调查。在NCDB中查询高危II级LGG患者。纳入标准仅限于接受确定性放疗和化疗的患者。患者被分为接受SAC或MAC的队列。采用Kaplan-Meier分析比较总生存期(OS),并通过Cox比例风险模型确定与OS独立相关的变量。在1029例患者中,989例(96.1%)接受了SAC,而40例(3.9%)接受了MAC。近期(2010 - 2012年)接受治疗的患者接受MAC的可能性较小(p = 0.029)。接受MAC和SAC治疗的患者中位OS无差异(45.3个月对59.2个月,p = 0.861)。OS较差的独立预测因素包括年龄>40岁、高Charlson-Deyo指数、其他政府/未记录的保险状态、仅活检、星形细胞瘤组织学、西部地理区域和高收入。用SAC替代MAC对OS无影响(p = 0.804)。在美国,SAC的使用显著多于MAC。接受SAC和MAC的患者之间OS无差异,在多变量分析中该因素也未影响OS,这表明用SAC替代MAC治疗LGG的做法可能不会对结果产生不利影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验