Pelliccia F, Pasceri V, Marazzi G, Arrivi A, Cacciotti L, Pannarale G, Speciale G, Greco C, Gaudio C
Department Attilio Reale, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Interventional Cardiology, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy.
J Hum Hypertens. 2017 Oct;31(10):647-653. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2017.35. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
We aimed to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of a protocol including lifestyle modifications and a novel combination of dietary supplements in prehypertension. A prospective, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 176 subjects (103 men, aged 52±10 years), with blood pressure (BP) of 130-139 mm Hg systolic and/or 85-89 mm Hg diastolic entered. After a single-blind run-in period, participants were randomised to twice daily placebo (n=88) or a commercially available combination pill (n=88). Primary endpoints were the differences in clinic BP between the two groups at the end of the trial. Secondary endpoints included intragroup differences in clinic BP during the study period and response rates (that is, BP <130/85 mm Hg or a BP reduction >5 mm Hg on week 12). Baseline characteristics were similar among the treatment groups. At 12 weeks, the supplement group had lower systolic BP (124±9 versus 132±7 mm Hg, P<0.0001) and similar diastolic BP (81±8 versus 82±7 mm Hg, P=0.382) compared to the placebo group. With respect to baseline measures, changes in BP with supplements were statistically significant for systolic (-9.3±4.2 mm Hg, P<0.0001) and diastolic values (-4.2±3.6 mm Hg, P<0.0001). Changes versus baseline in systolic and diastolic BP, conversely, were not different on placebo. The overall response rate at week 12 was significantly greater with supplements than placebo (58% (51 of 88) and 25% (22 of 88), respectively, P<0.0001). This randomised trial shows that combination of supplements with BP-lowering effect is an effective additional treatment to conventional lifestyle modifications for a better control of systolic BP in prehypertension.
我们旨在评估一种方案(包括生活方式改变和新型膳食补充剂组合)对高血压前期的疗效和耐受性。对176名受试者(103名男性,年龄52±10岁)进行了一项前瞻性、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验,这些受试者收缩压为130 - 139 mmHg和/或舒张压为85 - 89 mmHg。经过单盲导入期后,参与者被随机分为每日两次服用安慰剂组(n = 88)或市售组合药丸组(n = 88)。主要终点是试验结束时两组间诊室血压的差异。次要终点包括研究期间两组内诊室血压的差异以及缓解率(即第12周时血压<130/85 mmHg或血压降低>5 mmHg)。各治疗组的基线特征相似。在12周时,与安慰剂组相比,补充剂组的收缩压更低(124±9 vs 132±7 mmHg,P<0.0001),舒张压相似(81±8 vs 82±7 mmHg,P = 0.382)。相对于基线测量值,补充剂组收缩压(-9.3±4.2 mmHg,P<0.0001)和舒张压值(-4.2±3.6 mmHg,P<0.0001)的变化具有统计学意义。相反,安慰剂组收缩压和舒张压相对于基线的变化无差异。第12周时补充剂组的总体缓解率显著高于安慰剂组(分别为58%(88名中的51名)和25%(88名中的22名),P<0.0001)。这项随机试验表明,具有降压作用的补充剂组合是一种有效的额外治疗方法,可在传统生活方式改变的基础上更好地控制高血压前期的收缩压。