Grabowski David C, Joyce Nina R, McGuire Thomas G, Frank Richard G
David C. Grabowski (
Nina R. Joyce is a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 May 1;36(5):846-854. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1082.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Financial Alignment Initiative represents the largest effort to date to move beneficiaries who are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid-known as dual eligibles-into a coordinated care model by the use of passive (automatic) enrollment. Thirteen states are testing integrated payment and delivery demonstration programs in which an estimated 1.3 million dual eligibles are qualified to participate. As of October 2016, passive enrollment had brought over 300,000 dual eligibles into nine capitated programs in eight states. However, program participation levels remained relatively low. Across the eight states, only 26.7 percent of dual eligibles who were qualified to participate were enrolled, ranging from 5.3 percent for the two New York programs together to 62.4 percent in Ohio. Although the exact causes of the high rates of opting out and disenrolling that we observed among passively enrolled dual eligibles are unknown, experience to date suggests that administrative challenges were combined with demand- and supply-side barriers to enrollment. These early findings draw into question whether passive enrollment can encourage dual eligibles to participate in integrated care models.
医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的财务整合计划是迄今为止规模最大的一次尝试,旨在通过被动(自动)登记的方式,将符合医疗保险和医疗补助资格的受益人(即双重资格者)纳入协调护理模式。13个州正在测试综合支付和服务示范项目,预计约130万双重资格者有资格参与。截至2016年10月,被动登记已使超过30万双重资格者加入了8个州的9个按人头付费项目。然而,项目参与率仍然相对较低。在这8个州中,有资格参与的双重资格者中只有26.7%进行了登记,纽约的两个项目加起来为5.3%,俄亥俄州为62.4%。虽然我们观察到的被动登记双重资格者中退出和取消登记率较高的确切原因尚不清楚,但迄今为止的经验表明,行政挑战与登记的需求和供应方障碍交织在一起。这些早期发现让人质疑被动登记能否鼓励双重资格者参与综合护理模式。