Suppr超能文献

双重资格受益人的被动加入医疗保险和医疗补助管理式医疗未达预期。

Passive Enrollment Of Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries Into Medicare And Medicaid Managed Care Has Not Met Expectations.

作者信息

Grabowski David C, Joyce Nina R, McGuire Thomas G, Frank Richard G

机构信息

David C. Grabowski (

Nina R. Joyce is a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 May 1;36(5):846-854. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1082.

Abstract

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Financial Alignment Initiative represents the largest effort to date to move beneficiaries who are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid-known as dual eligibles-into a coordinated care model by the use of passive (automatic) enrollment. Thirteen states are testing integrated payment and delivery demonstration programs in which an estimated 1.3 million dual eligibles are qualified to participate. As of October 2016, passive enrollment had brought over 300,000 dual eligibles into nine capitated programs in eight states. However, program participation levels remained relatively low. Across the eight states, only 26.7 percent of dual eligibles who were qualified to participate were enrolled, ranging from 5.3 percent for the two New York programs together to 62.4 percent in Ohio. Although the exact causes of the high rates of opting out and disenrolling that we observed among passively enrolled dual eligibles are unknown, experience to date suggests that administrative challenges were combined with demand- and supply-side barriers to enrollment. These early findings draw into question whether passive enrollment can encourage dual eligibles to participate in integrated care models.

摘要

医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的财务整合计划是迄今为止规模最大的一次尝试,旨在通过被动(自动)登记的方式,将符合医疗保险和医疗补助资格的受益人(即双重资格者)纳入协调护理模式。13个州正在测试综合支付和服务示范项目,预计约130万双重资格者有资格参与。截至2016年10月,被动登记已使超过30万双重资格者加入了8个州的9个按人头付费项目。然而,项目参与率仍然相对较低。在这8个州中,有资格参与的双重资格者中只有26.7%进行了登记,纽约的两个项目加起来为5.3%,俄亥俄州为62.4%。虽然我们观察到的被动登记双重资格者中退出和取消登记率较高的确切原因尚不清楚,但迄今为止的经验表明,行政挑战与登记的需求和供应方障碍交织在一起。这些早期发现让人质疑被动登记能否鼓励双重资格者参与综合护理模式。

相似文献

1
Passive Enrollment Of Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries Into Medicare And Medicaid Managed Care Has Not Met Expectations.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 May 1;36(5):846-854. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1082.
2
National and state trends in enrollment and spending for dual eligibles under age 65 in Medicaid managed care.
Disabil Health J. 2013 Apr;6(2):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2012.11.004. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
3
There is little experience and limited data to support policy making on integrated care for dual eligibles.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Jun;31(6):1176-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0162.
4
Health care utilization among Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibles: a count data analysis.
BMC Public Health. 2006 Apr 5;6:88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-88.
5
Comparing Care for Dual-Eligibles Across Coverage Models: Empirical Evidence From Oregon.
Med Care Res Rev. 2019 Oct;76(5):661-677. doi: 10.1177/1077558717740206. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
6
Effect of long-term care use on Medicare and Medicaid expenditures for dual eligible and non-dual eligible elderly beneficiaries.
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2013 Aug 22;3(3). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.003.03.a05. eCollection 2013.
8
Return to work: a critical aspect of care coordination for younger dual eligibles.
Disabil Health J. 2013 Apr;6(2):95-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

2
Risk-based contracting for high-need Medicaid beneficiaries: The Arkansas PASSE program.
Health Policy Open. 2020 Dec 3;2:100023. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2020.100023. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Differences In Care Between Special Needs Plans And Other Medicare Coverage For Dual Eligibles.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Sep;41(9):1238-1247. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00463.
4
Aligning Medicaid and Medicare Advantage Managed Care Plans for Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries.
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Apr;79(2):207-217. doi: 10.1177/10775587211018938. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
6
The impact of Dual Eligible Special Need Plan regulations on healthcare utilization.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 7;21(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06228-3.
7
Care Plans, Care Teams, and Quality of Life for People with Disabilities.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):2274-2280. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05908-w. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
8
Switching Between Medicare Advantage And Traditional Medicare Before And After The Onset Of Functional Disability.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 May;39(5):809-818. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01070.
9
Medicaid Use among Older Low-Income Medicare Enrollees in California and Texas: A Tale of Two States.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2019 Dec 1;44(6):885-910. doi: 10.1215/03616878-7785799.
10
The effects of plan payment rates on the market for Medicare Advantage Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans.
Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;54(5):1137-1145. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13170. Epub 2019 May 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Health insurance status and the care of nursing home residents with advanced dementia.
JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(22):2047-53. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.10573.
2
There is little experience and limited data to support policy making on integrated care for dual eligibles.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Jun;31(6):1176-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0162.
3
Special Needs Plans and the coordination of benefits and services for dual eligibles.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):136-46. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.136.
4
Medicare and Medicaid: conflicting incentives for long-term care.
Milbank Q. 2007 Dec;85(4):579-610. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00502.x.
6
Medicare advantage SNPs: a new opportunity for integrated care?
Issue Brief George Wash Univ Natl Health Policy Forum. 2005 Nov 11(808):1-18.
7
Determinants of enrollment among applicants to PACE.
Health Care Financ Rev. 1997 Winter;19(2):135-53.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验