Spraker Matthew B, Nyflot Matthew, Hendrickson Kristi, Ford Eric, Kane Gabrielle, Zeng Jing
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jul-Aug;7(4):e253-e259. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
The safety and quality of radiation therapy have recently garnered increased attention in radiation oncology (RO). Although patient safety guidelines expect physicians and physicists to lead clinical safety and quality improvement (QI) programs, trainees' level of exposure to patient safety concepts during training is unknown.
We surveyed active medical and physics RO residents in North America in February 2016. Survey questions involved demographics and program characteristics, exposure to patient safety topics, and residents' attitude regarding their safety education.
Responses were collected from 139 of 690 (20%) medical and 56 of 248 (23%) physics RO residents. More than 60% of residents had no exposure or only informal exposure to incident learning systems (ILS), root cause analysis, failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), and the concepts of human factors engineering. Medical residents had less exposure to FMEA than physics residents, and fewer medical than physics residents felt confident in leading FMEA in clinic. Only 27% of residents felt that patient safety training was adequate in their program. Experiential learning through practical workshops was the most desired educational modality, preferred over web-based learning. Residents training in departments with ILS had greater exposure to patient safety concepts and felt more confident leading clinical patient safety and QI programs than residents training in departments without an ILS.
The survey results show that most residents have no or only informal exposure to important patient safety and QI concepts and do not feel confident leading clinical safety programs. This represents a gaping need in RO resident education. Educational programs such as these can be naturally developed as part of an incident learning program that focuses on near-miss events. Future research should assess the needs of RO program directors to develop effective RO patient safety and QI training programs.
放射治疗的安全性和质量最近在放射肿瘤学(RO)中受到了越来越多的关注。尽管患者安全指南期望医生和物理学家引领临床安全和质量改进(QI)项目,但培训期间学员对患者安全概念的接触程度尚不清楚。
2016年2月,我们对北美的在职医学和物理RO住院医师进行了调查。调查问题涉及人口统计学和项目特征、对患者安全主题的接触情况以及住院医师对其安全教育的态度。
共收集到690名医学RO住院医师中139名(20%)以及248名物理RO住院医师中56名(23%)的回复。超过60%的住院医师未接触或仅非正式接触过事件学习系统(ILS)、根本原因分析、失效模式与效应分析(FMEA)以及人因工程学概念。医学住院医师对FMEA的接触少于物理住院医师,且认为自己有信心在临床中主导FMEA的医学住院医师比物理住院医师更少。只有27%的住院医师认为其所在项目中的患者安全培训足够。通过实践工作坊进行的体验式学习是最受欢迎的教育方式,比基于网络的学习更受青睐。在设有ILS的科室接受培训的住院医师比在没有ILS的科室接受培训的住院医师对患者安全概念有更多接触,并且在主导临床患者安全和QI项目方面更有信心。
调查结果表明,大多数住院医师未接触或仅非正式接触过重要的患者安全和QI概念,并且对主导临床安全项目缺乏信心。这表明RO住院医师教育存在巨大需求。像这样的教育项目可以自然地作为专注于未遂事件的事件学习项目的一部分来开发。未来的研究应评估RO项目主任开发有效的RO患者安全和QI培训项目的需求。