Cosgrove Christopher T, Putnam Sara M, Cherney Steven M, Ricci William M, Spraggs-Hughes Amanda, McAndrew Christopher M, Gardner Michael J
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Aug;31(8):440-446. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000882.
To determine whether the position of the medial clamp tine during syndesmotic reduction affected reduction accuracy.
Prospective cohort.
Urban Level 1 trauma center.
Seventy-two patients with operatively treated syndesmotic injuries.
Patients underwent operative fixation of their ankle syndesmotic injuries using reduction forceps. The position of the medial clamp tine was then recorded with intraoperative fluoroscopy. Malreduction rates were then assessed with bilateral ankle computerized tomography.
Fibular position within the incisura was measured with respect to the uninjured side to determine whether a malreduction had occurred. Malreductions were then analyzed for associations with injury pattern, patient demographics, and the location of the medial clamp tine.
A statistically significant association was found between medial clamp position and sagittal plane syndesmosis malreduction. In reference to anterior fibular translation, there was a 0% malreduction rate in the 18 patients where the clamp tine was placed in the anterior third, a 19.4% malreduction rate in the middle third, and 60% malreduction rate in the posterior third (P = 0.006). In reference to posterior fibular translation, there was a 11.1% malreduction when clamp placement was in the anterior third, a 16.1% malreduction rate in the middle third, and 60% malreduction rate in the posterior third (P = 0.062). There were no significant associations between medial clamp position and coronal plane malreductions (overcompression or undercompression) (P = 1).
When using reduction forceps for syndesmotic reduction, the position of the medial clamp tine can be highly variable. The angle created with off-axis syndesmotic clamping is likely a major culprit in iatrogenic malreduction. Sagittal plane malreduction appears to be highly sensitive to clamp obliquity, which is directly related to the medial clamp tine placement. Based on these data, we recommend placing the medial clamp tine in the anterior third of the tibial line on the lateral view to minimize malreduction risk.
Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
确定下胫腓联合复位过程中内侧钳齿的位置是否会影响复位准确性。
前瞻性队列研究。
城市一级创伤中心。
72例接受手术治疗的下胫腓联合损伤患者。
患者使用复位钳对踝关节下胫腓联合损伤进行手术固定。然后通过术中透视记录内侧钳齿的位置。随后通过双侧踝关节计算机断层扫描评估复位不良率。
相对于未受伤侧测量腓骨在胫腓切迹内的位置,以确定是否发生复位不良。然后分析复位不良与损伤类型、患者人口统计学特征以及内侧钳齿位置之间的关联。
发现内侧钳位置与矢状面下胫腓联合复位不良之间存在统计学显著关联。关于腓骨向前移位,钳齿置于前三分之一的18例患者中复位不良率为0%,中三分之一为19.4%,后三分之一为60%(P = 0.006)。关于腓骨向后移位,钳置于前三分之一时复位不良率为11.1%,中三分之一为16.1%,后三分之一为60%(P = 0.062)。内侧钳位置与冠状面复位不良(过度压缩或压缩不足)之间无显著关联(P = 1)。
使用复位钳进行下胫腓联合复位时,内侧钳齿的位置可能变化很大。与非轴向下胫腓联合钳夹形成的角度可能是医源性复位不良的主要原因。矢状面复位不良似乎对钳的倾斜高度敏感,这与内侧钳齿的放置直接相关。基于这些数据,我们建议在侧位片上将内侧钳齿置于胫骨线的前三分之一处,以尽量降低复位不良风险。
治疗性四级证据。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。