Suppr超能文献

剪切波弹性成像与彩色多普勒的联合应用:避免对经粗针活检诊断的纤维上皮性病变进行不必要的乳腺切除的可行方法。

Combination of shear-wave elastography and color Doppler: Feasible method to avoid unnecessary breast excision of fibroepithelial lesions diagnosed by core needle biopsy.

作者信息

Kim Ga Ram, Choi Ji Soo, Han Boo-Kyung, Ko Eun Young, Ko Eun Sook, Hahn Soo Yeon

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiology, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 May 4;12(5):e0175380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175380. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated shear-wave elastography (SWE) and color Doppler ultrasonography (US) features for fibroepithelial lesions (FELs), and to evaluate their utility to differentiate fibroadenomas (FAs) and phyllodes tumors (PTs).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 67 FELs pathologically confirmed (49 FAs, 18 PTs). B-mode US, SWE and color Doppler US were performed for each lesion. Mean elasticity (Emean), maximum elasticity (Emax), and vascularity were determined by SWE and Doppler US. Diagnostic performances were calculated to differentiate FAs and PTs. Equivocal FELs diagnosed by core needle biopsy (CNB) were further analyzed.

RESULTS

Median Emean and Emax were significantly lower for FAs than PTs (Emean, 15.7 vs. 66.7 kPa; Emax, 21.0 vs. 76.7 kPa, P<0.01). Low vascularity (0-1 vessel flow) on color Doppler US were more frequent in FAs than in PTs (P<0.01). SWE showed significantly higher specificities (Emean >43.9 kPa, 89.8%; Emax >46.1 kPa, 79.6%) than B-mode US (42.9%) (P<0.01) for differentiating PTs from FAs. Other diagnostic values of SWE and overall diagnostic values of Doppler US were not significantly different from B-mode US (P>0.05). The combination of SWE and Doppler US with 'Emean>43.9 kPa or high vascularity (≥2 vessel flows)' showed a higher area under the curve (0.786 vs. 0.687) and higher diagnostic values than B-mode US (sensitivity, 100 vs. 94.4%; specificity, 57.1 vs. 42.9%; positive predictive value, 46.2 vs. 37.8%; negative predictive value, 100 vs. 95.5%), without statistical significance (P>0.05). Of the 30 equivocal FELs, all lesions with 'Emean≤43.9 kPa and low vascularity (0-1 vessel flow)' (23.3%, 7/30) were finally confirmed as FAs by excision.

CONCLUSION

FAs have a tendency to have less stiffness and lower vascularity than PTs. Combined SWE and color Doppler US may help patients with equivocal FELs diagnosed by CNB avoid unnecessary excision.

摘要

背景

我们评估了剪切波弹性成像(SWE)和彩色多普勒超声(US)对纤维上皮性病变(FELs)的特征,并评估它们在鉴别纤维腺瘤(FAs)和叶状肿瘤(PTs)方面的效用。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了67例经病理证实的FELs(49例FAs,18例PTs)。对每个病变进行B超、SWE和彩色多普勒超声检查。通过SWE和多普勒超声测定平均弹性(Emean)、最大弹性(Emax)和血管化程度。计算鉴别FAs和PTs的诊断性能。对经粗针活检(CNB)诊断为可疑的FELs进行进一步分析。

结果

FAs的Emean和Emax中位数显著低于PTs(Emean,15.7对66.7kPa;Emax,21.0对76.7kPa,P<0.01)。彩色多普勒超声显示低血管化(0-1支血管血流)在FAs中比在PTs中更常见(P<0.01)。在鉴别PTs和FAs方面,SWE显示出比B超更高的特异性(Emean>43.9kPa,89.8%;Emax>46.1kPa,79.6%)(42.9%)(P<0.01)。SWE的其他诊断价值和多普勒超声的总体诊断价值与B超无显著差异(P>0.05)。SWE和多普勒超声联合使用“Emean>43.9kPa或高血管化(≥2支血管血流)”显示出更高的曲线下面积(0.786对0.687)和比B超更高的诊断价值(敏感性,100对94.4%;特异性,57.1对42.9%;阳性预测值,46.2对3.....8%;阴性预测值,100对95.5%),无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在30例可疑FELs中,所有“Emean≤43.9kPa且低血管化(0-1支血管血流)”的病变(23.3%,7/30)最终经切除证实为FAs。

结论

FAs比PTs往往具有更低的硬度和更低的血管化程度。联合SWE和彩色多普勒超声可能有助于经CNB诊断为可疑FELs的患者避免不必要的切除。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deb4/5417487/98cc5ac83e5f/pone.0175380.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验