Zmistowski Benjamin M, Clyde Corey T, Ghanem Elie S, Gotoff James R, Deirmengian Carl A, Parvizi Javad
Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2820-2824. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.068. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
Determining optimal timing of reimplantation during 2-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains elusive. Joint aspiration for synovial white blood cell (WBC) count and neutrophil percentage (PMN%) before reimplantation is widely performed; yet, the implications are rarely understood. Therefore, this study investigates (1) the diagnostic yield of synovial WBC count and differential analysis and (2) the calculated thresholds for persistent infection.
Institutional PJI databases identified 129 patients undergoing 2-stage exchange arthroplasty who had joint aspiration before reimplantation between February 2005 and May 2014. Persistent infection was defined as a positive aspirate culture, positive intraoperative cultures, or persistent symptoms of PJI-including subsequent PJI-related surgery. Receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to calculate thresholds maximizing sensitivity and specificity.
Thirty-three cases (33 of 129; 25.6%) were classified with persistent PJI. Compared with infection-free patients, these patients had significantly elevated PMN% (62.2% vs 48.9%; P = .03) and WBC count (1804 vs 954 cells/μL; P = .04). The receiver-operating characteristic curve provided thresholds of 62% and 640 cells/μL for synovial PMN% and WBC count, respectively. These thresholds provided sensitivity of 63% and 54.5% and specificity of 62% and 60.0%, respectively. The risk of persistent PJI for patients with PMN% >90% was 46.7% (7 of 15).
Synovial fluid analysis before reimplantation has unclear utility. Although statistically significant elevations in synovial WBC count and PMN% are observed for patients with persistent PJI, this did not translate into useful thresholds with clinical importance. However, with little other guidance regarding the timing of reimplantation, severely elevated WBC count and differential analysis may be of use.
在两阶段翻修治疗假体周围关节感染(PJI)过程中,确定再植入的最佳时机仍然不明确。在再植入前进行关节穿刺以获取滑膜白细胞(WBC)计数和中性粒细胞百分比(PMN%)的操作广泛开展,但其中的意义却很少被理解。因此,本研究调查了(1)滑膜WBC计数和分类分析的诊断价值,以及(2)持续性感染的计算阈值。
机构性PJI数据库确定了129例接受两阶段翻修关节成形术的患者,这些患者在2005年2月至2014年5月期间再植入前进行了关节穿刺。持续性感染定义为穿刺培养阳性、术中培养阳性或PJI的持续症状,包括随后的PJI相关手术。采用受试者操作特征曲线来计算使敏感性和特异性最大化的阈值。
33例(129例中的33例;25.6%)被归类为持续性PJI。与无感染患者相比,这些患者的PMN%(62.2%对48.9%;P = .03)和WBC计数(1804对954个细胞/μL;P = .04)显著升高。受试者操作特征曲线分别为滑膜PMN%和WBC计数提供了62%和640个细胞/μL的阈值。这些阈值的敏感性分别为63%和54.5%,特异性分别为62%和60.0%。PMN%>90%的患者持续性PJI的风险为46.7%(15例中的7例)。
再植入前的滑液分析效用不明确。虽然持续性PJI患者的滑膜WBC计数和PMN%在统计学上有显著升高,但这并未转化为具有临床重要性的有用阈值。然而,由于关于再植入时机的其他指导很少,WBC计数严重升高和分类分析可能会有用。