Suppr超能文献

家庭无创正压通气对重度稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的影响:一项荟萃分析

[Effect of home noninvasive positive pressure ventilation on patients with severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis].

作者信息

Liu Y, Dai B, Su J, Peng Y, Tan W, Zhao H W

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2017 May 12;40(5):354-362. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2017.05.009.

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of home noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) on patients with severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD) by meta-analysis. The data of this meta-analysis was retrieved from the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, Wanfang, Weipu and CNKI databases from January 1980 to January 2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on comparison of the effect of home NPPV in patients with severe stable COPD were enrolled. The enrolled data were divided into different subgroups in terms of the levels of inspiratory positive airway pressure(IPAP), different duration of ventilation per day, and different levels of baseline hypercapnia on change in PaCO(2). Meta-analysis was performed to compare the effect of different subgroups by RevMan 5.3. Ten studies with a total of 789 patients were included. Home NPPV improved 6-minute walk distance (WMD: -45.12, 95% -85.39--4.85, =0.03) and forced expiratory volume in the first second [standard mean difference(SMD): -0.26, 95% -0.51--0.02, =0.03]after 1 year of ventilation, but did not improve the mortality, PaCO(2,)PaO(2,)pH, FVC, maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), FEV(1)/FVC, maximal voluntary ventilation(MVV) total sleep time, sleep efficiency and the proportion of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Subgroup analysis showed that home NPPV can significantly reduce the PaCO(2) in patients ventilated with 18 cmH(2)O(1 cmH(2)O=0.098 kPa) and higher IPAP levels than those with lower IPAP levels (SMD: -0.6, 95%: -1.09--0.12, =0.01), and in patients with NPPV for at least 5 h per day and those with lower duration (SMD: -0.45, 95%: -0.87--0.02, =0.04), and in patients with baseline PaCO(2) of at least 55 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) (SMD: -0.69, 95%: -1.07--0.31, =0.00) than those with lower levels. Home NPPV can improve 6MWD and FEV(1) in severe stable COPD patients but does not improve the mortality, gas exchange and sleep efficiency. Patients may gain more benefits when using higher IPAP levels, longer ventilation per day and in those with higher baseline PaCO(2).

摘要

通过荟萃分析评估家庭无创正压通气(NPPV)对重度稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的影响。本荟萃分析的数据检索自1980年1月至2016年1月的PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、万方、维普和知网数据库。纳入比较家庭NPPV对重度稳定期COPD患者疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)。根据吸气气道正压(IPAP)水平、每天不同的通气时长以及PaCO₂变化时不同的基线高碳酸血症水平,将纳入的数据分为不同亚组。使用RevMan 5.3对不同亚组的疗效进行荟萃分析。共纳入10项研究,总计789例患者。通气1年后,家庭NPPV改善了6分钟步行距离(加权均数差:-45.12,95%可信区间 -85.39至-4.85,P = 0.03)和第1秒用力呼气量[标准均数差(SMD):-0.26,95%可信区间 -0.51至-0.02,P = 0.03],但未改善死亡率、PaCO₂、PaO₂、pH、用力肺活量(FVC)、最大吸气压力(MIP)、FEV₁/FVC、最大自主通气量(MVV)、总睡眠时间、睡眠效率和快速眼动(REM)睡眠比例。亚组分析表明,与IPAP水平较低的患者相比,使用IPAP水平为18 cmH₂O(1 cmH₂O = 0.098 kPa)及以上的家庭NPPV患者PaCO₂可显著降低(SMD:-0.6,95%可信区间 -1.09至-0.12,P = 0.01);与通气时长较短的患者相比,每天至少通气5小时的家庭NPPV患者PaCO₂也可显著降低(SMD:-0.45,95%可信区间 -0.87至-0.02,P = 0.04);与基线PaCO₂水平较低的患者相比,基线PaCO₂至少为55 mmHg(1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa)的家庭NPPV患者PaCO₂同样可显著降低(SMD:-0.69,95%可信区间 -1.07至-0.31,P = 0.00)。家庭NPPV可改善重度稳定期COPD患者的6分钟步行距离和FEV₁,但不能改善死亡率、气体交换和睡眠效率。使用较高的IPAP水平、每天较长的通气时间以及基线PaCO₂较高的患者可能获益更多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验