Reidy Paul T, McKenzie Alec I, Brunker Preston, Nelson Daniel S, Barrows Katherine M, Supiano Mark, LaStayo Paul C, Drummond Micah J
1 Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah.
2 Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah.
Rejuvenation Res. 2017 Dec;20(6):449-461. doi: 10.1089/rej.2017.1942. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
Short-term bed rest in older adults is characterized by significant loss in leg lean mass and strength posing significant health consequences. The purpose of this study was to determine in healthy older adults if the daily combination of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and protein supplementation (NMES+PRO) would protect muscle mass and function after 5 days of bed rest. Twenty healthy older adults (∼70 years) were subjected to 5 days of continuous bed rest and were randomized into one of two groups: NMES+PRO (n = 10) or control (CON) (n = 10). The NMES+PRO group received bilateral NMES to quadriceps (40 minutes/session, 3 × /day; morning, afternoon, and evening) followed by an interventional protein supplement (17 g). The CON group received an isocaloric equivalent beverage. Before and after bed rest, vastus lateralis biopsies occurred before and after acute essential amino acid (EAA) ingestion for purposes of acutely stimulating mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTORC1) signaling, a major regulator of muscle protein synthesis, in response to bed rest and NMES+PRO. Baseline (pre and post bed rest) muscle samples were also used to assess myofiber characteristics and gene expression of muscle atrophy markers. Thigh lean mass and muscle function were measured before and after bed rest. Five days of bed rest reduced thigh lean mass, muscle function, myofiber cross-sectional area, satellite cell content, blunted EAA-induced mTORC1 signaling, and increased myostatin and MAFbx mRNA expression. Interestingly, NMES+PRO during bed rest maintained thigh lean mass, but not muscle function. Thigh muscle preservation during bed rest with NMES+PRO may partly be explained by attenuation of myostatin and MAFbx mRNA expression rather than restoration of nutrient-induced mTORC1 signaling. We conclude that the combination of NMES and protein supplementation thrice a day may be an effective therapeutic tool to use to preserve thigh muscle mass during periods of short-term hospitalization in older adults. However this combined intervention was not effective to prevent the loss in muscle function.
老年人短期卧床休息的特点是腿部去脂体重和力量显著下降,会带来严重的健康后果。本研究的目的是确定在健康老年人中,每日进行神经肌肉电刺激与蛋白质补充剂联合使用(NMES+PRO)是否能在卧床休息5天后保护肌肉质量和功能。20名健康老年人(约70岁)接受了5天的持续卧床休息,并被随机分为两组之一:NMES+PRO组(n = 10)或对照组(CON)(n = 10)。NMES+PRO组接受双侧股四头肌的NMES(每次40分钟,每天3次;上午、下午和晚上),随后服用一种干预性蛋白质补充剂(17克)。CON组接受等热量的等效饮料。在卧床休息前后,为了急性刺激雷帕霉素机制性靶标(mTORC1)信号传导(肌肉蛋白质合成的主要调节因子)以应对卧床休息和NMES+PRO,在急性摄入必需氨基酸(EAA)前后进行股外侧肌活检。基线(卧床休息前后)肌肉样本也用于评估肌纤维特征和肌肉萎缩标志物的基因表达。在卧床休息前后测量大腿去脂体重和肌肉功能。5天的卧床休息降低了大腿去脂体重、肌肉功能、肌纤维横截面积、卫星细胞含量,减弱了EAA诱导的mTORC1信号传导,并增加了肌肉生长抑制素和MAFbx mRNA表达。有趣的是,卧床休息期间的NMES+PRO维持了大腿去脂体重,但未维持肌肉功能。卧床休息期间使用NMES+PRO对大腿肌肉的保护作用可能部分是由于肌肉生长抑制素和MAFbx mRNA表达的减弱,而不是营养诱导的mTORC1信号传导的恢复。我们得出结论,NMES与每日三次蛋白质补充剂联合使用可能是一种有效的治疗工具,可用于在老年人短期住院期间保留大腿肌肉质量。然而,这种联合干预对于预防肌肉功能丧失并不有效。