Dagher Julien, Kammerer-Jacquet Solène-Florence, Dugay Frédéric, Beaumont Marion, Lespagnol Alexandra, Cornevin Laurence, Verhoest Grégory, Bensalah Karim, Rioux-Leclercq Nathalie, Belaud-Rotureau Marc-Antoine
IRSET INSERM UMR 1085, Faculté de Médecine de Rennes 1, 35043, Rennes, France.
Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Université de Rennes 1, 35042, Rennes, France.
Virchows Arch. 2017 Jul;471(1):107-115. doi: 10.1007/s00428-017-2124-0. Epub 2017 May 10.
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) has a poor prognosis with a 50% risk of metastases. Little is known about the phenotypic and molecular profiles of metastases regarding their corresponding primary tumors. This study aimed to screen phenotypic and genotypic differences between metastases and their corresponding primary tumors. We selected four cases with available frozen material. The histological, immunohistochemical (VEGFA, CD31, SMA, Ki67, p53, PAR-3), FISH (VHL gene), next-generation sequencing (VHL and c-MET genes), multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, and array-(comparative genomic hybridization) CGH analyses were realized. Metastases were nodal, hepatic (synchronous), adrenal, and pulmonary (metachronous). High-grade tumor cells were significantly more frequent in metastases (p = 0.019). Metastases and high-grade zones of primary tumors shared similar characteristics compared to low-grade zones: a lower microscopic vascular density (43.5 vs 382.5 vessels/mm; p = 0.0027), a higher expression of VEGF (73 vs 10%, p = 0.045), Ki67 (37.6 vs 8.3%; p = 0.011), and p53 (54 vs 10.6%; p = 0.081), and a cytoplasmic and membranous PAR-3 staining. Metastases exhibited more chromosomal imbalances than primary tumors in total (18.75 ± 6.8; p = 0.044) with more genomic gains (13.5 ± 7; p = 0.013). The loss of chromosome 9 and gain of Xq were found in both primary tumors and metastases but gains of loci or chromosomes 2p, 3q, 5, 8q, 12, and 20 were only found in metastases. The VHL gene status was similar in each tumor couple. Although metastases and primary tumors share common histological features, this study highlights chromosomal differences specific to metastases which could be involved in ccRCC metastatic evolution.
透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)预后较差,发生转移的风险为50%。关于转移灶相对于其相应原发肿瘤的表型和分子特征,人们了解甚少。本研究旨在筛选转移灶与其相应原发肿瘤之间的表型和基因型差异。我们选取了4例有可用冷冻材料的病例。进行了组织学、免疫组织化学(VEGFA、CD31、SMA、Ki67、p53、PAR-3)、荧光原位杂交(VHL基因)、二代测序(VHL和c-MET基因)、多重连接依赖探针扩增以及阵列比较基因组杂交(array-CGH)分析。转移灶位于淋巴结、肝脏(同时性)、肾上腺和肺(异时性)。转移灶中高级别肿瘤细胞明显更常见(p = 0.019)。与低级别区域相比,转移灶和原发肿瘤的高级别区域具有相似特征:微血管密度较低(43.5对382.5个血管/mm;p = 0.0027),VEGF表达较高(73%对10%,p = 0.045),Ki67表达较高(37.6%对8.3%;p = 0.011),p53表达较高(54%对10.6%;p = 0.081),以及PAR-3呈细胞质和膜染色。转移灶总体上比原发肿瘤表现出更多的染色体失衡(18.75 ± 6.8;p = 0.044),基因组增益更多(13.5 ± 7;p = 0.013)。原发肿瘤和转移灶中均发现了9号染色体缺失和Xq增益,但仅在转移灶中发现了2p、3q、5、8q、12和20号位点或染色体的增益。每对肿瘤中VHL基因状态相似。虽然转移灶和原发肿瘤具有共同的组织学特征,但本研究突出了转移灶特有的染色体差异,这些差异可能参与ccRCC的转移演变。