Suppr超能文献

时型、身体活动与运动表现:系统回顾

Chronotype, Physical Activity, and Sport Performance: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy.

UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Alta, Norway.

出版信息

Sports Med. 2017 Sep;47(9):1859-1868. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0741-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many variables related to sport have been shown to have circadian rhythms. Chronotype is the expression of circadian rhythmicity in an individual, and three categories of chronotype are defined: morning types (M-types), evening types (E-types), and neither types (N-types). M-types show earlier peaks of several psychophysiological variables during the day than E-types. The effect of chronotype on athletic performance has not been extensively investigated.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present review was to study the effect of chronotype on athletic performance and the psychophysiological responses to physical activity.

METHODS

The present review adheres to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) reporting guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for scientific papers using the keywords "chronotype", "circadian typology", "morningness", and "eveningness" in combination with each of the words "sport", "performance", and "athletic." Relevant reference lists were inspected. We limited the search results to peer-reviewed papers published in English from 1985 to 2015.

RESULTS

Ten papers met our inclusion criteria. Rating of perceived exertion and fatigue scores in relation to athletic performances are influenced by chronotype: M-types perceived less effort when performing a submaximal physical task in the morning than did N- and E-types. In addition, M-types generally showed better athletic performances, as measured by race times, in the morning than did N- and E-types. Other results concerning chronotype effect on physiological responses to physical activity were not always consistent: heterogeneous samples and different kinds of physical activity could partially explain these discrepancies.

CONCLUSIONS

Sports trainers and coaches should take into account the influence of both the time of day and chronotype effect when scheduling training sessions into specific time periods.

摘要

背景

许多与运动相关的变量都表现出了昼夜节律。时型是个体昼夜节律的表现,分为三种类型:早起型(M 型)、晚睡型(E 型)和中间型(N 型)。M 型在白天的几项心理生理变量上表现出更早的峰值,而 E 型则较晚。时型对运动表现的影响尚未得到广泛研究。

目的

本综述的目的是研究时型对运动表现和对体育活动的心理生理反应的影响。

方法

本综述遵循 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)报告准则。我们在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 上使用关键词“chronotype”“circadian typology”“morningness”和“eveningness”,并结合“sport”“performance”和“athletic”,搜索了科学论文。检查了相关的参考文献列表。我们将搜索结果限制为 1985 年至 2015 年期间以英文发表的同行评审论文。

结果

有 10 篇论文符合我们的纳入标准。与运动表现相关的主观体力感觉和疲劳评分受到时型的影响:M 型在早上进行亚最大体力任务时,比 N 型和 E 型感觉体力付出较少。此外,M 型通常在早上的运动表现上表现更好,如比赛时间。其他关于时型对体育活动生理反应影响的结果并不总是一致的:异质样本和不同类型的体育活动可能部分解释了这些差异。

结论

体育训练员和教练在安排训练时间时,应考虑到一天中的时间和时型效应的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验