Rowett E, Patterson F, Cousans F, Elley K
Work Psychology Group, Derby, UK.
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Br Dent J. 2017 May 12;222(9):715-719. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.410.
Objective and setting This paper describes the evaluation of a pilot situational judgement test (SJT) for selection into UK Dental Core Training (DCT). The SJT's psychometric properties, group differences based on gender and ethnicity, and candidate reactions were assessed.Methods The SJT targets four non-academic attributes important for success in DCT. Data were collected alongside live selection processes from five Health Education England local teams in the UK (N = 386). Candidates completed the pilot SJT and an evaluation questionnaire to examine their reactions to the test.Results SJT scores were relatively normally distributed and showed acceptable levels of internal reliability (α = 0.68). Difficulty level and partial correlations between scenarios and SJT total score were in the expected ranges (64.61% to 90.03% and r = 0.06 to 0.41, respectively). No group differences were found for gender, and group differences between White and BME candidates were minimal. Most candidates perceived the SJT as relevant to the target role, appropriate and fair.Conclusions This study demonstrated the potential suitability of an SJT for use in DCT selection. Future research should replicate these preliminary findings in other cohorts, and assess the predictive validity of the SJT for predicting key training and practice-based outcomes.
目的与背景 本文描述了一项用于选拔进入英国牙科核心培训(DCT)的情景判断测试(SJT)试点的评估情况。评估了该SJT的心理测量特性、基于性别和种族的群体差异以及考生的反应。
方法 该SJT针对对DCT成功至关重要的四个非学术属性。数据是在英国五个英格兰健康教育地方团队的现场选拔过程中收集的(N = 386)。考生完成了试点SJT和一份评估问卷,以检查他们对该测试的反应。
结果 SJT分数相对呈正态分布,内部信度水平可接受(α = 0.68)。情景的难度水平以及情景与SJT总分之间的偏相关在预期范围内(分别为64.61%至90.03%和r = 0.06至0.41)。未发现性别方面的群体差异,白人和少数族裔候选人之间的群体差异最小。大多数考生认为SJT与目标角色相关、合适且公平。
结论 本研究证明了SJT在DCT选拔中使用的潜在适用性。未来的研究应在其他队列中重复这些初步发现,并评估SJT对预测关键培训和基于实践的结果的预测效度。