Suppr超能文献

三种不同方法检测肺转移小鼠循环肿瘤细胞的比较。

Comparison of three different methods for the detection of circulating tumor cells in mice with lung metastasis.

作者信息

Xu Weifeng, Wu Bing, Fu Lengxi, Chen Junying, Wang Zeng, Huang Fei, Chen Jinrong, Zhang Mei, Zhang Zhenhuan, Lin Jingan, Lan Ruilong, Chen Ruiqing, Chen Wei, Chen Long, Hong Jinsheng, Zhang Weijian, Ding Yuxiong, Okunieff Paul, Lin Jianhua, Zhang Lurong

机构信息

First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350005, P.R. China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.

出版信息

Oncol Rep. 2017 Jun;37(6):3219-3226. doi: 10.3892/or.2017.5613. Epub 2017 May 2.

Abstract

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) represent the key step of cancer cell dissemination. The alteration of CTCs correlates with the treatment outcome and prognosis. To enrich and identify CTCs from billions of blood cells renders a very challenging task, which triggers development of several methods, including lysis of RBC plus negative or positive enrichment using antibodies, and filter membrane or spiral microfluidics to capture CTCs. To compare the advantages of different enrichment methods for CTCs, we utilized the 4T1 breast cancer cells transfected with both green fluorescent protein (GFP) and luciferase to trace CTCs in the experimental lung metastasis model. Three methods were used to detect CTCs at the same time: bioluminescence assay, smearing method, and membrane filter method. The in vivo alive mouse imaging was used to dynamically monitor the growth of lung metastases. The sensitivity and accuracy of three detection methods were compared side-by-side. Our results showed that 1) the sensitivity of bioluminescence assay was the highest, but there was no information of CTC morphology; 2) the smearing method and membrane filter method could observe the detail of CTC morphology, such as in single or in cluster, while their sensitivity was lower than bioluminescence assay; 3) A dynamic observation at a 7-day intervals, the lung metastatic cancer grew at a log speed, while CTCs were increased at a low speed. This might be due to the activated immune cells eliminating the CTCs at a speed much faster than CTCs were generated. This comparison of three CTC detection methods in mouse model suggests that bioluminescence assay could be used in quantitative study of the effect of certain agent on the suppression of CTCs, while GFP-based morphological assays could be used to study the dissemination mechanism of CTCs. The combination of both bioluminescence assay and GFP-based assay would generate more information for quantity and quality of CTCs.

摘要

循环肿瘤细胞(CTCs)是癌细胞播散的关键步骤。CTCs的变化与治疗效果和预后相关。从数十亿血细胞中富集和鉴定CTCs是一项极具挑战性的任务,这促使了多种方法的发展,包括红细胞裂解加抗体阴性或阳性富集,以及使用滤膜或螺旋微流控技术捕获CTCs。为比较不同CTCs富集方法的优势,我们利用转染了绿色荧光蛋白(GFP)和荧光素酶的4T1乳腺癌细胞在实验性肺转移模型中追踪CTCs。同时使用三种方法检测CTCs:生物发光测定法、涂片法和膜过滤法。采用体内活体小鼠成像动态监测肺转移灶的生长情况。对三种检测方法的灵敏度和准确性进行了并列比较。我们的结果表明:1)生物发光测定法的灵敏度最高,但无法提供CTCs形态信息;2)涂片法和膜过滤法能够观察到CTCs的形态细节,如单个或成簇状态,但其灵敏度低于生物发光测定法;3)每隔7天进行动态观察,肺转移癌呈对数速度生长,而CTCs则低速增加。这可能是由于活化的免疫细胞以比CTCs生成速度快得多的速度清除CTCs。在小鼠模型中对三种CTCs检测方法的比较表明,生物发光测定法可用于定量研究某些药物对CTCs抑制作用的效果,而基于GFP的形态学检测可用于研究CTCs的播散机制。生物发光测定法和基于GFP的检测方法相结合将为CTCs的数量和质量提供更多信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc2/5442393/80630fdca958/OR-37-06-3219-g00.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验