Suppr超能文献

临床颈淋巴结阴性(cN0)甲状腺乳头状癌预防性中央区颈淋巴结清扫的合理性:还有什么可说的吗?单中心十年经验。

Rationality in prophylactic central neck dissection in clinically node-negative (cN0) papillary thyroid carcinoma: Is there anything more to say? A decade experience in a single-center.

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Cattinara Teaching Hospital, Strada di Fiume, 34149, Trieste, Italy.

Division of General Surgery, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Cattinara Teaching Hospital, Strada di Fiume, 34149, Trieste, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2017 May;41 Suppl 1:S40-S47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.113.

Abstract

AIM

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common thyroid malignancy. Despite its extremely favorable prognosis, cervical lymph node metastases are a common feature of PTC and a known independent risk factor for local recurrence. However, the role of prophylactic central neck dissection (PCND) remains a matter of debate in patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) PTC. To better clarify the current role of PCND in the surgical treatment of PTC, evaluating advantages and disadvantages of PCND and outcome of cN0 PTC patients who have been treated with either total thyroidectomy alone or in combination with PCND. A review of recent literature data is performed.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and December 2015, 186 consecutive patients with cN0 PTC were identified to be included in the present study. 74 of these underwent total thyroidectomy associated with PCND, while 112 patients underwent total thyroidectomy alone. The epidemiological and clinical-pathological data of all patients included were collected at diagnosis and during follow-up.

RESULTS

Overall complication rate was significantly higher in the group of patients undergoing PCND (39.2% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.0006). To be specific, they presented a considerably increased risk of temporary recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (p = 0.009) and of permanent hypothyroidism (p = 0.016). Overall survival and recurrence rates did not differ between those undergoing PCND and those undergoing total thyroidectomy alone (p = 1.000 and p = 0.715, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study do not support the routine use of PCND in the treatment of cN0 PTC patients.

摘要

目的

甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)是最常见的甲状腺恶性肿瘤。尽管其预后极佳,但颈淋巴结转移是 PTC 的常见特征,也是局部复发的已知独立危险因素。然而,在临床淋巴结阴性(cN0)PTC 患者中,预防性中央颈部清扫术(PCND)的作用仍存在争议。为了更好地阐明 PCND 在 PTC 手术治疗中的作用,评估单独行全甲状腺切除术与联合行 PCND 治疗 cN0 PTC 患者的优缺点及结局。对近期文献数据进行了回顾。

方法

2000 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月,本研究共纳入 186 例连续的 cN0 PTC 患者。其中 74 例行全甲状腺切除术联合 PCND,112 例行全甲状腺切除术。所有患者的流行病学和临床病理数据均在诊断和随访期间收集。

结果

PCND 组患者的总并发症发生率明显更高(39.2% vs. 17.8%,p=0.0006)。具体而言,PCND 组患者暂时性喉返神经损伤(p=0.009)和永久性甲状腺功能减退症(p=0.016)的风险显著增加。PCND 组和全甲状腺切除术组患者的总生存率和复发率无差异(p=1.000 和 p=0.715)。

结论

本研究结果不支持常规在 cN0 PTC 患者的治疗中使用 PCND。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验