Balasubramanian M, Spencer A J, Short S D, Watkins K, Chrisopoulos S, Brennan D S
Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, School of Dentistry, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, FDI World Dental Federation, Switzerland.
Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, School of Dentistry, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Community Dent Health. 2016 Sep;33(3):225-231. doi: 10.1922/CDH_3842Balasubramanian07.
The integration of qualitative and quantitative approaches introduces new avenues to bridge strengths, and address weaknesses of both methods.
To develop measure(s) for migrant dentist experiences in Australia through a mixed methods approach.
The sequential qualitative-quantitative design involved first the harvesting of data items from qualitative study, followed by a national survey of migrant dentists in Australia. Statements representing unique experiences in migrant dentists' life stories were deployed the survey questionnaire, using a five-point Likert scale. Factor analysis was used to examine component factors.
Eighty-two statements from 51 participants were harvested from the qualitative analysis. A total of 1,022 of 1,977 migrant dentists (response rate 54.5%) returned completed questionnaires. Factor analysis supported an initial eight-factor solution; further scale development and reliability analysis led to five scales with a final list of 38 life story experience (LSE) items. Three scales were based on home country events: health system and general lifestyle concerns (LSE1; 10 items), society and culture (LSE4; 4 items) and career development (LSE5; 4 items). Two scales included migrant experiences in Australia: appreciation towards Australian way of life (LSE2; 13 items) and settlement concerns (LSE3; 7 items).
The five life story experience scales provided necessary conceptual clarity and empirical grounding to explore migrant dentist experiences in Australia. Being based on original migrant dentist narrations, these scales have the potential to offer in-depth insights for policy makers and support future research on dentist migration.
定性和定量方法的整合为结合两种方法的优势及弥补各自不足开辟了新途径。
通过混合方法开发衡量澳大利亚移民牙医经历的指标。
采用定性-定量的序列设计,首先从定性研究中收集数据项,随后对澳大利亚的移民牙医进行全国性调查。代表移民牙医生活故事中独特经历的陈述被用于调查问卷,采用五点李克特量表。使用因子分析来检验组成因素。
从定性分析中收集了51名参与者的82条陈述。1977名移民牙医中有1022名(回复率54.5%)返回了完整的问卷。因子分析支持最初的八因素解决方案;进一步的量表开发和信度分析得出了五个量表,最终列出了38项生活故事经历(LSE)项目。三个量表基于原籍国事件:卫生系统和总体生活方式问题(LSE1;10项)、社会和文化(LSE4;4项)以及职业发展(LSE5;4项)。两个量表包括在澳大利亚的移民经历:对澳大利亚生活方式的欣赏(LSE2;13项)和定居问题(LSE3;7项)。
这五个生活故事经历量表为探索澳大利亚移民牙医的经历提供了必要的概念清晰度和实证基础。基于移民牙医的原始叙述,这些量表有可能为政策制定者提供深入见解,并支持未来关于牙医移民的研究。