Suppr超能文献

内镜检查室深度镇静的安全性。

Safety of deep sedation in the endoscopy suite.

作者信息

Allen Megan L

机构信息

aDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, The Royal Melbourne Hospital bDepartment of Cancer Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain medicine Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre cAnaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine Unit, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Aug;30(4):501-506. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000479.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the complexity of endoscopic procedures increases, the use of propofol and the desire for deep sedation are becoming more common in the endoscopy suite. This review explores sedation depth, agents used for sedation, recommended monitoring, and adverse event risks that occur during sedation for endoscopy.

RECENT FINDINGS

The sedation provider for endoscopy varies by practice location and with regulatory requirements. As increasingly deep levels of sedation are used in this setting, the need for all providers to have training in the ability to rescue patients from sedation-related side effects is paramount. Propofol has an important role for prolonged and uncomfortable endoscopic interventions and has a strong safety record in the endoscopy suite. Vital signs monitoring is recommended during all endoscopy sedation, and there is emerging interest in advanced monitoring (e.g., capnography, processed electroencephalogram, respiratory monitoring) in this setting. The reported rate of adverse events during endoscopy sedation varies widely; however, advanced age and increasing American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score are consistently associated with increased risk. Whether anesthesiologist-administered sedation is safer than non-anesthesiologist-administered sedation remains controversial.

SUMMARY

This review provides some guidance to providers who administer sedation in the endoscopy suite and is intended to improve the safety of patients. The recommendations are based on best available evidence and expert opinion.

摘要

综述目的

随着内镜检查程序的复杂性增加,丙泊酚的使用以及深度镇静的需求在内镜检查室中变得越来越普遍。本综述探讨了内镜检查镇静期间的镇静深度、所用镇静药物、推荐的监测方法以及不良事件风险。

最新发现

内镜检查的镇静提供者因实践地点和监管要求而异。鉴于在此环境中使用的镇静深度越来越深,所有提供者都需要接受培训,具备从与镇静相关的副作用中抢救患者的能力,这一点至关重要。丙泊酚在延长和不适的内镜干预中具有重要作用,并且在内镜检查室中有良好的安全记录。建议在所有内镜检查镇静期间进行生命体征监测,并且在这种情况下,人们对高级监测(例如,二氧化碳监测、处理后的脑电图、呼吸监测)的兴趣也在增加。内镜检查镇静期间报告的不良事件发生率差异很大;然而,高龄和美国麻醉医师协会身体状况评分增加一直与风险增加相关。麻醉医生实施的镇静是否比非麻醉医生实施的镇静更安全仍存在争议。

总结

本综述为在内镜检查室实施镇静的提供者提供了一些指导,旨在提高患者的安全性。这些建议基于现有最佳证据和专家意见。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验