Schulz Daniel, Grumann Dorothee, Trübe Patricia, Pritchett-Corning Kathleen, Johnson Sarah, Reppschläger Kevin, Gumz Janine, Sundaramoorthy Nandakumar, Michalik Stephan, Berg Sabine, van den Brandt Jens, Fister Richard, Monecke Stefan, Uy Benedict, Schmidt Frank, Bröker Barbara M, Wiles Siouxsie, Holtfreter Silva
Department of Immunology, University Medicine GreifswaldGreifswald, Germany.
Charles River, Research and Professional ServicesWilmington, MA, USA.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017 May 2;7:152. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00152. eCollection 2017.
Whether mice are an appropriate model for infection and vaccination studies is a matter of debate, because they are not considered as natural hosts of . We previously identified a mouse-adapted strain, which caused infections in laboratory mice. This raised the question whether laboratory mice are commonly colonized with and whether this might impact on infection experiments. Publicly available health reports from commercial vendors revealed that colonization is rather frequent, with rates as high as 21% among specific-pathogen-free mice. In animal facilities, was readily transmitted from parents to offspring, which became persistently colonized. Among 99 murine isolates from Charles River Laboratories half belonged to the lineage CC88 (54.5%), followed by CC15, CC5, CC188, and CC8. A comparison of human and murine isolates revealed features of host adaptation. In detail, murine strains lacked -converting phages and superantigen-encoding mobile genetic elements, and were frequently ampicillin-sensitive. Moreover, murine CC88 isolates coagulated mouse plasma faster than human CC88 isolates. Importantly, colonization clearly primed the murine immune system, inducing a systemic IgG response specific for numerous proteins, including several vaccine candidates. Phospholipase C emerged as a promising test antigen for monitoring colonization in laboratory mice. In conclusion, laboratory mice are natural hosts of and therefore, could provide better infection models than previously assumed. Pre-exposure to the bacteria is a possible confounder in infection and vaccination studies and should be monitored.
小鼠是否是感染和疫苗接种研究的合适模型存在争议,因为它们不被视为……的天然宿主。我们之前鉴定出一种适应小鼠的……菌株,它能在实验室小鼠中引发感染。这就引发了一个问题,即实验室小鼠是否普遍被……定植,以及这是否会影响感染实验。商业供应商公开的健康报告显示,……定植相当频繁,在无特定病原体小鼠中的发生率高达21%。在动物设施中,……很容易从亲代传播给子代,子代会持续被定植。在从查尔斯河实验室分离出的99株鼠源……菌株中,一半属于CC88谱系(54.5%),其次是CC15、CC5、CC188和CC8。对人和鼠源……分离株的比较揭示了宿主适应性特征。具体而言,鼠源菌株缺乏……转化噬菌体和编码超抗原的移动遗传元件,并且经常对氨苄青霉素敏感。此外,鼠源CC88分离株比人源CC88分离株更快地使小鼠血浆凝固。重要的是,……定植明显使小鼠免疫系统致敏,诱导针对多种……蛋白(包括几种候选疫苗)的全身性IgG反应。磷脂酶C成为监测实验室小鼠……定植的一种有前景的检测抗原。总之,实验室小鼠是……的天然宿主,因此,它们可能提供比之前设想更好的感染模型。在……感染和疫苗接种研究中,预先接触该细菌是一个可能的混杂因素,应该进行监测。