VanNasdale Dean A, Eilerman Amanda, Zimmerman Aaron, Lai Nicky, Ramsey Keith, Sinnott Loraine T
*OD, PhD, FAAO †OD, MS ‡OD, MS, FAAO §MS ∥PhD The Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio (all authors).
Optom Vis Sci. 2017 Jun;94(6):664-671. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001084.
The aims of this study were to use cross-sectional optical coherence tomography imaging and custom curve fitting software to evaluate and model the foveal curvature as a spherical surface and to compare the radius of curvature in the horizontal and vertical meridians and test the sensitivity of this technique to anticipated meridional differences.
Six 30-degree foveal-centered radial optical coherence tomography cross-section scans were acquired in the right eye of 20 clinically normal subjects. Cross sections were manually segmented, and custom curve fitting software was used to determine foveal pit radius of curvature using the central 500, 1000, and 1500 μm of the foveal contour. Radius of curvature was compared across different fitting distances. Root mean square error was used to determine goodness of fit. The radius of curvature was compared between the horizontal and vertical meridians for each fitting distance.
There radius of curvature was significantly different when comparing each of the three fitting distances (P < .01 for each comparison). The average radii of curvature were 970 μm (95% confidence interval [CI], 913 to 1028 μm), 1386 μm (95% CI, 1339 to 1439 μm), and 2121 μm (95% CI, 2066 to 2183) for the 500-, 1000-, and 1500-μm fitting distances, respectively. Root mean square error was also significantly different when comparing each fitting distance (P < .01 for each comparison). The average root mean square errors were 2.48 μm (95% CI, 2.41 to 2.53 μm), 6.22 μm (95% CI, 5.77 to 6.60 μm), and 13.82 μm (95% CI, 12.93 to 14.58 μm) for the 500-, 1000-, and 1500-μm fitting distances, respectively. The radius of curvature between the horizontal and vertical meridian radii was statistically different only in the 1000- and 1500-μm fitting distances (P < .01 for each), with the horizontal meridian being flatter than the vertical.
The foveal contour can be modeled as a sphere with low curve fitting error over a limited distance and capable of detecting subtle foveal contour differences between meridians.
本研究旨在使用横断面光学相干断层扫描成像和定制曲线拟合软件,将中央凹曲率评估为球面并进行建模,比较水平和垂直子午线方向的曲率半径,并测试该技术对预期子午线差异的敏感性。
对20名临床正常受试者的右眼进行6次以中央凹为中心、30度的放射状光学相干断层扫描横断面扫描。对横断面进行手动分割,并使用定制曲线拟合软件,利用中央凹轮廓中央500、1000和1500μm区域来确定中央凹坑的曲率半径。比较不同拟合距离下的曲率半径。使用均方根误差来确定拟合优度。比较每个拟合距离下水平和垂直子午线方向的曲率半径。
比较三个拟合距离中的每一个时,曲率半径均有显著差异(每次比较P <.01)。对于500μm、1000μm和1500μm的拟合距离,平均曲率半径分别为970μm(95%置信区间[CI],913至1028μm)、1386μm(95%CI,1339至1439μm)和2121μm(95%CI,2066至2183μm)。比较每个拟合距离时,均方根误差也有显著差异(每次比较P <.01)。对于500μm、1000μm和1500μm的拟合距离,平均均方根误差分别为2.48μm(95%CI,2.41至2.53μm)、6.22μm(95%CI,5.77至6.60μm)和13.82μm(95%CI,12.93至14.58μm)。仅在1000μm和1500μm的拟合距离下,水平和垂直子午线方向的曲率半径在统计学上存在差异(每次P <.01),水平子午线比垂直子午线更平坦。
中央凹轮廓可建模为一个球体,在有限距离内曲线拟合误差较小,并且能够检测子午线之间细微的中央凹轮廓差异。