Villareal Dennis T, Aguirre Lina, Gurney A Burke, Waters Debra L, Sinacore David R, Colombo Elizabeth, Armamento-Villareal Reina, Qualls Clifford
From the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Baylor College of Medicine, and the Center for Translational Research on Inflammatory Diseases, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center - both in Houston (D.T.V., R.A.-V.); Medicine Care Line, New Mexico VA Health Care System (L.A., D.L.W., E.C.), and the Department of Internal Medicine (L.A., E.C.), the Division of Physical Therapy (A.B.G.), and the Department of Mathematics and Statistics (C.Q.), University of New Mexico School of Medicine - both in Albuquerque; the Department of Medicine, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (D.L.W.); and the Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (D.R.S.).
N Engl J Med. 2017 May 18;376(20):1943-1955. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1616338.
Obesity causes frailty in older adults; however, weight loss might accelerate age-related loss of muscle and bone mass and resultant sarcopenia and osteopenia.
In this clinical trial involving 160 obese older adults, we evaluated the effectiveness of several exercise modes in reversing frailty and preventing reduction in muscle and bone mass induced by weight loss. Participants were randomly assigned to a weight-management program plus one of three exercise programs - aerobic training, resistance training, or combined aerobic and resistance training - or to a control group (no weight-management or exercise program). The primary outcome was the change in Physical Performance Test score from baseline to 6 months (scores range from 0 to 36 points; higher scores indicate better performance). Secondary outcomes included changes in other frailty measures, body composition, bone mineral density, and physical functions.
A total of 141 participants completed the study. The Physical Performance Test score increased more in the combination group than in the aerobic and resistance groups (27.9 to 33.4 points [21% increase] vs. 29.3 to 33.2 points [14% increase] and 28.8 to 32.7 points [14% increase], respectively; P=0.01 and P=0.02 after Bonferroni correction); the scores increased more in all exercise groups than in the control group (P<0.001 for between-group comparisons). Peak oxygen consumption (milliliters per kilogram of body weight per minute) increased more in the combination and aerobic groups (17.2 to 20.3 [17% increase] and 17.6 to 20.9 [18% increase], respectively) than in the resistance group (17.0 to 18.3 [8% increase]) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Strength increased more in the combination and resistance groups (272 to 320 kg [18% increase] and 288 to 337 kg [19% increase], respectively) than in the aerobic group (265 to 270 kg [4% increase]) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Body weight decreased by 9% in all exercise groups but did not change significantly in the control group. Lean mass decreased less in the combination and resistance groups than in the aerobic group (56.5 to 54.8 kg [3% decrease] and 58.1 to 57.1 kg [2% decrease], respectively, vs. 55.0 to 52.3 kg [5% decrease]), as did bone mineral density at the total hip (grams per square centimeter; 1.010 to 0.996 [1% decrease] and 1.047 to 1.041 [0.5% decrease], respectively, vs. 1.018 to 0.991 [3% decrease]) (P<0.05 for all comparisons). Exercise-related adverse events included musculoskeletal injuries.
Of the methods tested, weight loss plus combined aerobic and resistance exercise was the most effective in improving functional status of obese older adults. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; LITOE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01065636 .).
肥胖会导致老年人身体虚弱;然而,体重减轻可能会加速与年龄相关的肌肉和骨量流失,进而导致肌肉减少症和骨质减少。
在这项涉及160名肥胖老年人的临床试验中,我们评估了几种运动模式在逆转身体虚弱以及预防体重减轻引起的肌肉和骨量减少方面的有效性。参与者被随机分配到一个体重管理计划加以下三种运动计划之一——有氧训练、抗阻训练或有氧与抗阻联合训练——或一个对照组(无体重管理或运动计划)。主要结局是从基线到6个月时身体性能测试得分的变化(得分范围为0至36分;得分越高表明表现越好)。次要结局包括其他身体虚弱指标、身体成分、骨密度和身体功能的变化。
共有141名参与者完成了研究。联合训练组的身体性能测试得分增幅大于有氧训练组和抗阻训练组(分别从27.9分增至33.4分[增加21%]、从29.3分增至33.2分[增加14%]和从28.8分增至32.7分[增加14%];经Bonferroni校正后P = 0.01和P = 0.02);所有运动组的得分增幅均大于对照组(组间比较P < 0.001)。联合训练组和有氧训练组的峰值摄氧量(每分钟每千克体重毫升数)增幅大于抗阻训练组(分别从17.2增至20.3[增加17%]和从17.6增至20.9[增加18%],而抗阻训练组从17.0增至18.3[增加8%])(两项比较P < 0.001)。联合训练组和抗阻训练组的力量增幅大于有氧训练组(分别从272千克增至320千克[增加1十八%]和从288千克增至337千克[增加19%],而有氧训练组从265千克增至270千克[增加4%])(两项比较P < 0.001)。所有运动组的体重下降了9%,而对照组无显著变化。联合训练组和抗阻训练组的去脂体重减少幅度小于有氧训练组(分别从56.5千克减至54.8千克[减少3%]和从58.1千克减至57.1千克[减少2%],而有氧训练组从55.0千克减至52.3千克[减少5%]),全髋部骨密度也是如此(每平方厘米克数;分别从1.010减至0.996[减少1%]和从1.047减至1.041[减少0.5%],而有氧训练组从1.018减至0.991[减少3%])(所有比较P < 0.05)。与运动相关的不良事件包括肌肉骨骼损伤。
在测试的方法中,体重减轻加有氧与抗阻联合运动在改善肥胖老年人的功能状态方面最有效。(由美国国立卫生研究院资助;LITOE临床试验注册号,NCT01065636。)