Kjærgaard Søren, Canudas-Romo Vladimir
a University of Southern Denmark.
Popul Stud (Camb). 2017 Jul;71(2):171-186. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2017.1310919. Epub 2017 May 18.
The 'prospective potential support ratio' has been proposed by researchers as a measure that accurately quantifies the burden of ageing, by identifying the fraction of a population that has passed a certain measure of longevity, for example, 17 years of life expectancy. Nevertheless, the prospective potential support ratio usually focuses on the current mortality schedule, or period life expectancy. Instead, in this paper we look at the actual mortality experienced by cohorts in a population, using cohort life tables. We analyse differences between the two perspectives using mortality models, historical data, and forecasted data. Cohort life expectancy takes future mortality improvements into account, unlike period life expectancy, leading to a higher prospective potential support ratio. Our results indicate that using cohort instead of period life expectancy returns around 0.5 extra younger people per older person among the analysed countries. We discuss the policy implications implied by our cohort measures.
研究人员提出了“预期潜在抚养比”这一指标,通过确定达到一定长寿标准(例如预期寿命为17岁)的人口比例,来准确量化老龄化负担。然而,预期潜在抚养比通常关注当前的死亡率表,即时期预期寿命。相反,在本文中,我们使用队列生命表来研究人群中各队列实际经历的死亡率。我们使用死亡率模型、历史数据和预测数据来分析这两种视角之间的差异。与时期预期寿命不同,队列预期寿命考虑了未来死亡率的改善情况,从而导致更高的预期潜在抚养比。我们的结果表明,在所分析的国家中,使用队列预期寿命而非时期预期寿命,每位老年人对应的年轻人数量会多出约0.5人。我们讨论了我们基于队列的测量方法所蕴含的政策意义。