a Department of Psychology , Stellenbosch University , Matieland , South Africa.
Death Stud. 2017 Sep;41(8):512-520. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2017.1333355. Epub 2017 May 22.
The cultural turn in critical suicidology notes the limitations of dominant acontextual, biomedical, quantitative approaches to suicide prevention. Qualitative methods are idealized within this cultural turn as the only way to advance suicidology. Qualitative methods, however, also have limitations. Drawing on our research with traditional healers in South Africa, the authors explore tensions associated with making truth claims based on qualitative research. Turning the critical gaze on their work, they consider the question of what we can claim to know about suicide prevention when investigating culture using qualitative methods. The authors suggest a circumspect approach to making truth claims about what the cultural turn can achieve.
批判自杀学的文化转向注意到主流的非语境化、生物医学、定量方法在预防自杀方面的局限性。在这种文化转向中,定性方法被理想化,被视为推进自杀学的唯一途径。然而,定性方法也有其局限性。本文借鉴了我们在南非传统治疗师研究中的经验,探讨了基于定性研究提出真理主张所涉及的紧张关系。通过批判性地审视他们的工作,作者考虑了在使用定性方法研究文化时,我们可以声称对预防自杀有哪些了解的问题。作者建议对文化转向所能实现的目标提出真理主张时应持谨慎态度。