Department of Sociology and Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Manor Road, OxfordOX1 3UQ, UK.
Hum Reprod. 2017 Jul 1;32(7):1482-1488. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex102.
How does the cognitive development of children conceived after ART (IVF and ICSI) - measured as cognitive skills at age 3, 5, 7 and 11 years - differ over time from those born after natural conception (NC)?
Improved measures of cognitive development up to age 5 years were recorded in children conceived with ART compared to NC, which attenuates by 11 years, with ART children still scoring slightly better than NC children.
Results on the cognitive outcomes of children conceived after ART have been highly contradictory. Some have shown that ART children have an impaired behavioural, socio-emotional and cognitive development and higher risk of mental disorders. Others have reported no increased risk or difference. Cognitive development has not been previously examined using latent growth curve models from ages 3 to 11 years, also including appropriate attention to confounding parental characteristics.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Longitudinal data for the first five waves (2000-2012) of the UK Millennium Cohort Study were used, which is a two-stage sample of all infants born in 2000-2001 and resident in the UK at 9 months of age, drawn from the Department of Social Security Child Benefit Registers. A final sample of N = 15 218 children (125 IVF and 61 ICSI), from 14 816 families was used. Information was available for all waves for 8298 children. Four additional follow-up surveys were conducted in 2003, 2005, 2007 and 2012.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Our sample includes children born within a union (married or cohabiting parents) and where information on cognitive scores was available for at least two measurement points. Cognitive development was assessed with the British Ability Scales. At age 3 and 5 years (wave 2 and 3), children completed the naming vocabulary component, which measures expressive verbal ability. At age 7 years (wave 4), verbal cognitive abilities were assessed through the word reading test, and at age 11 years (wave 5) through a verbal similarity test. Two-tailed Student's t-tests examined differences between ART and NC groups. Growth curve models (random-coefficient, latent trajectory models) were used to study the effect of ART, confounding parental characteristics and health outcomes at birth, both at a baseline level of cognitive ability at age 3 years and on its growth rate.
At age 3 and 5 years, children conceived with the aid of ART have higher verbal cognitive abilities than NC children (P < 0.001) but this consistently decreases over time and diminishes by age 11 years. Parental environment and resources are pivotal in children's cognitive development.
LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION: The sample size of the ART cohort of children is small across each time period (N = 150-180) in comparison with NC children (N = 10 496-11 955). Owing to a limited sample size, we are also unable to compare IVF versus ICSI treatment.
With the increasing use of IVF and ICSI, these results indicate that there are no detrimental effects on children's early cognitive outcomes up to age 11 years, and highlight the importance of parental characteristics.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Funding for this project was provided by the European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP7 2007-2013) (No. 320116 Families and Societies), ESRC/NCRM SOCGEN Grant (ES/N0011856/1) and the SOCIOGENOME ERC Consolidator Grant (ERC-2013-CoG-615603) (to M.C.M.). The authors have no competing interests to declare.
N/A.
通过比较 3 岁、5 岁、7 岁和 11 岁时的认知技能,评估体外受精和卵胞浆内单精子注射(ART)后受孕的儿童与自然受孕(NC)儿童的认知发展有何不同?
与 NC 相比,ART 受孕的儿童在 5 岁之前认知发展有显著提高,但到 11 岁时这种差异逐渐减弱,ART 儿童的认知评分仍略高于 NC 儿童。
关于 ART 受孕儿童认知结果的研究结果一直存在很大争议。一些研究表明,ART 受孕的儿童在行为、社会情感和认知发展方面存在障碍,且患精神障碍的风险更高。其他研究则报告称,ART 受孕的儿童没有更高的风险或差异。以前没有使用从 3 岁到 11 岁的潜在增长曲线模型来检查认知发展,也没有适当注意混杂的父母特征。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:使用了英国千禧年队列研究的前五个波次(2000-2012 年)的纵向数据,这是一项针对 2000-2001 年出生且在 9 个月大时居住在英国的所有婴儿的两阶段抽样,来自社会保障儿童福利登记处。最终样本包括来自 14816 个家庭的 15218 名儿童(125 名 IVF 和 61 名 ICSI)。共有 8298 名儿童的所有波次信息可用。在 2003、2005、2007 和 2012 年还进行了另外四次后续调查。
参与者/材料、设置、方法:我们的样本包括在一个联盟(已婚或同居父母)中出生的儿童,并且至少有两个测量点的认知评分信息可用。使用英国能力量表评估认知发展。在 3 岁和 5 岁(第 2 波和第 3 波)时,儿童完成了命名词汇成分,该成分衡量表达性语言能力。在 7 岁(第 4 波)时,通过单词阅读测试评估言语认知能力,在 11 岁(第 5 波)时通过言语相似性测试评估言语认知能力。使用双尾学生 t 检验比较了 ART 和 NC 组之间的差异。生长曲线模型(随机系数、潜在轨迹模型)用于研究 ART、混杂的父母特征和出生时的健康结果对认知能力的基线水平及其增长率的影响。
在 3 岁和 5 岁时,借助辅助生殖技术受孕的儿童的言语认知能力高于 NC 儿童(P < 0.001),但随着时间的推移,这种差异持续下降,到 11 岁时减弱。父母环境和资源是儿童认知发展的关键。
局限性、谨慎的原因:与 NC 儿童(10496-11955)相比,ART 儿童队列的每个时间段的样本量都很小(N=150-180)。由于样本量有限,我们也无法比较 IVF 与 ICSI 治疗。
随着 IVF 和 ICSI 的使用增加,这些结果表明,儿童在 11 岁之前的早期认知结果没有受到不利影响,并强调了父母特征的重要性。
研究资金/利益冲突:该项目的资金由欧盟第七框架计划(2007-2013 年)(第 320116 号家庭和社会)、ESRC/NCRM SOCGEN 资助(ES/N0011856/1)和 SOCIOGENOME ERC 巩固者赠款(ERC-2013-CoG-615603)(M.C.M.)提供。作者没有利益冲突需要声明。
无。