Tscharntke Teja, Vidal Stefan, Hawkins Bradford A
Department of Agroecology, University of Göttingen, Waldweg 26, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.
Department of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, University of Göttingen, Grisebachstraße 6, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.
Oecologia. 2001 Nov;129(3):445-451. doi: 10.1007/s004420100733. Epub 2001 Nov 1.
We compared the parasitoid communities associated with grass-feeding herbivores in Germany and Britain to examine geographical consistency in community composition and to test ecological characteristics of the plants and host insects that may explain variability in parasitoid community structure. The parasitoid communities of 16 chalcid wasps feeding on ten grass species were sampled between 1986 and 1989 at 4-11 sites per grass species in southwest Germany. The data were compared to published data from Great Britain, comprising 18 chalcid hosts on ten grass species sampled between 1980 and 1992 at 24 sites in Wales and England. Results showed that many conclusions drawn from patterns in Britain did not hold for Germany, emphasizing the need to repeat analyses in different geographical regions. The parasitoid communities of the Tetramesa hosts included on average 8.1 parasitoid species in Germany, while the British hosts supported only 4.1 parasitoids. The number of monophagous parasitoid species was similar in both areas (2.4 vs 3.2), but German host populations supported many more polyphagous species (5.1 vs 0.9). This difference reinforces the earlier conclusion that parasitoid communities in Britain are highly undersaturated. Increased numbers of parasitoid species in Germany did not result in increased parasitism rates, so the closer species packing was paralleled by reduced impact of each species. In Germany, percent parasitism (range: 5-74%) was closely correlated with log host density, explaining 90% of the variance, while in Great Britain, percent parasitism was less variable (range: 36-76%) and was not related to host density or other host or host plant characteristics. Gallers and non-gallers supported equal numbers of parasitoids in both Germany and Britain, offering support for neither the enemy hypothesis of the adaptive nature of plant galls nor for the finding that galls are often more susceptible to enemy attack than their non-galling relatives. Furthermore, gregarious Tetramesa hosts were not attacked by more parasitoid species than solitary hosts.
我们比较了德国和英国以食草动物为食的寄生蜂群落,以检验群落组成的地理一致性,并测试可能解释寄生蜂群落结构变异性的植物和寄主昆虫的生态特征。1986年至1989年间,在德国西南部,对以10种草为食的16种小蜂科寄生蜂的群落进行了采样,每种草在4至11个地点进行采样。这些数据与来自英国的已发表数据进行了比较,英国的数据包括1980年至1992年间在威尔士和英格兰的24个地点对10种草上的18种小蜂科寄主进行的采样。结果表明,许多从英国的模式得出的结论在德国并不成立,这强调了在不同地理区域重复分析的必要性。在德国,Tetramesa寄主的寄生蜂群落平均包括8.1种寄生蜂,而英国的寄主仅支持4.1种寄生蜂。两个地区单食性寄生蜂物种的数量相似(2.4种对3.2种),但德国的寄主种群支持更多的多食性物种(5.1种对0.9种)。这种差异强化了早期的结论,即英国的寄生蜂群落高度不饱和。德国寄生蜂物种数量的增加并没有导致寄生率的提高,因此物种分布越密集,每个物种的影响就越小。在德国,寄生率百分比(范围:5 - 74%)与寄主密度的对数密切相关,解释了90%的方差,而在英国,寄生率百分比变化较小(范围:36 - 76%),与寄主密度或其他寄主或寄主植物特征无关。在德国和英国,形成虫瘿的寄主和不形成虫瘿的寄主支持的寄生蜂数量相等,这既不支持植物虫瘿适应性本质的敌害假说,也不支持虫瘿通常比不形成虫瘿的同类更容易受到敌害攻击的发现。此外,群居的Tetramesa寄主受到的寄生蜂物种攻击并不比独居寄主多。