Hadgraft Nyssa T, Willenberg Lisa, LaMontagne Anthony D, Malkoski Keti, Dunstan David W, Healy Genevieve N, Moodie Marj, Eakin Elizabeth G, Owen Neville, Lawler Sheleigh P
Physical Activity Laboratory, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 May 30;14(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0530-y.
Office workers spend much of their time sitting, which is now understood to be a risk factor for several chronic diseases. This qualitative study examined participants' perspectives following their involvement in a cluster randomised controlled trial of a multi-component intervention targeting prolonged workplace sitting (Stand Up Victoria). The intervention incorporated a sit-stand workstation, individual health coaching and organisational support strategies. The aim of the study was to explore the acceptability of the intervention, barriers and facilitators to reducing workplace sitting, and perceived effects of the intervention on workplace culture, productivity and health-related outcomes.
Semi-structured interviews (n = 21 participants) and two focus groups (n = 7) were conducted with intervention participants at the conclusion of the 12 month trial and thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Questions covered intervention acceptability, overall impact, barriers and facilitators to reducing workplace sitting, and perceived impact on productivity and workplace culture.
Overall, participants had positive intervention experiences, perceiving that reductions in workplace sitting were associated with improved health and well-being with limited negative impact on work performance. While sit-stand workstations appeared to be the primary drivers of change, workstation design and limited suitability of standing for some job tasks and situations were perceived as barriers to their use. Social support from team leaders and other participants was perceived to facilitate behavioural changes and a shift in norms towards increased acceptance of standing in the workplace.
Multi-component interventions to reduce workplace sitting, incorporating sit-stand workstations, are acceptable and feasible; however, supportive social and environmental conditions are required to support participant engagement. Best practice approaches to reduce workplace sitting should address the multiple levels of influence on behaviour, including factors that may act as barriers to behavioural change.
上班族大部分时间都坐着,现在人们认为这是几种慢性病的风险因素。这项定性研究调查了参与者在参与一项针对长时间在工作场所久坐的多成分干预措施(“站起来,维多利亚”)的整群随机对照试验后的观点。该干预措施包括一个坐站两用工作站、个人健康指导和组织支持策略。本研究的目的是探讨该干预措施的可接受性、减少工作场所久坐行为的障碍和促进因素,以及该干预措施对工作场所文化、生产力和健康相关结果的感知影响。
在为期12个月的试验结束时,对干预措施的参与者进行了半结构式访谈(21名参与者)和两个焦点小组讨论(7名参与者),并采用主题分析法对数据进行分析。问题涵盖干预措施的可接受性、总体影响、减少工作场所久坐行为的障碍和促进因素,以及对生产力和工作场所文化的感知影响。
总体而言,参与者有积极的干预体验,认为工作场所久坐行为的减少与健康和幸福感的改善有关,对工作表现的负面影响有限。虽然坐站两用工作站似乎是改变的主要驱动因素,但工作站的设计以及某些工作任务和情况中站立的适用性有限被认为是使用这些工作站的障碍。团队领导和其他参与者的社会支持被认为有助于行为改变,并促使规范发生转变,使人们更能接受在工作场所站立。
采用坐站两用工作站的多成分干预措施来减少工作场所久坐行为是可接受且可行的;然而,需要支持性的社会和环境条件来促进参与者的参与。减少工作场所久坐行为的最佳实践方法应解决对行为的多层次影响,包括可能成为行为改变障碍的因素。