On the Heterogeneity and Politics of the Judicialization of Health in Brazil.
作者信息
Biehl João, Socal Mariana P, Amon Joseph J
机构信息
Susan Dod Brown Professor of Anthropology and Woodrow Wilson School Faculty Associate, Princeton University, Princeton, USA.
Doctoral Candidate at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
出版信息
Health Hum Rights. 2016 Dec;18(2):269-271.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
On the Heterogeneity and Politics of the Judicialization of Health in Brazil.论巴西卫生司法化的异质性与政治
Health Hum Rights. 2016 Dec;18(2):269-271.
2
3
Alternatives for the enforcement of the right to health in Brazil.巴西实现健康权的其他途径。
Nurs Ethics. 2016 May;23(3):318-27. doi: 10.1177/0969733014562991. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
4
Illegal immigrants, health care, and social responsibility.非法移民、医疗保健与社会责任。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2004 Jan-Feb;34(1):34-41.
5
Right-to-Medicines Litigation and Universal Health Coverage: Institutional Determinants of the Judicialization of Health in Brazil.药品权利诉讼与全民健康覆盖：巴西卫生司法化的制度决定因素。
Health Hum Rights. 2020 Jun;22(1):221-235.
6
Moving the Debate Forward in Right to Health Litigation.推动健康权诉讼辩论向前发展。
Health Hum Rights. 2016 Dec;18(2):265-268.
7
Defining questions: situating issues of power in the formation of a right to health under international law.界定问题：在国际法规定的健康权形成过程中定位权力问题。
Hum Rights Q. 1996 May;18(2):398-438. doi: 10.1353/hrq.1996.0025.
8
[Legal remedies: therapeutic markets and the judicialization of the right to health].[法律补救措施：治疗市场与健康权的司法化]
Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos. 2016 Jan-Mar;23(1):173-92. doi: 10.1590/S0104-59702016000100011.
9
Introduction: Pharmaceutical firms and the right to health.引言：制药公司与健康权。
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Summer;40(2):183-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00656.x.
10
Centre-staging citizenship, power and communities in accountability discourses: An overview.在问责话语中中心式呈现公民身份、权力和社区：概述。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2021 Oct-Dec;VI(4):273-278. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2021.073.
引用本文的文献
1
The Right to Health as a Tool of Social Control: Compulsory Treatment Orders by Courts in Brazil.健康权作为社会控制工具：巴西法院的强制治疗令。
Health Hum Rights. 2022 Jun;24(1):159-169.
2
Supreme Court v. Necropolitics: The Chaotic Judicialization of COVID-19 in Brazil.最高法院诉“疫权政治”：巴西新冠肺炎疫情的混乱司法化
Health Hum Rights. 2021 Jun;23(1):151-162.
3
Expanding the Debate: Citizen Participation for the Implementation of the Right to Health in Brazil.拓展辩论：巴西公民参与健康权的实施
Health Hum Rights. 2018 Jun;20(1):163-172.
本文引用的文献
1
Moving the Debate Forward in Right to Health Litigation.推动健康权诉讼辩论向前发展。
Health Hum Rights. 2016 Dec;18(2):265-268.
2
4
Between the court and the clinic: lawsuits for medicines and the right to health in Brazil.法庭与诊所之间：巴西的药品诉讼与健康权
Health Hum Rights. 2012 Jun 15;14(1):E36-52.
5
The right to health in the courts of Brazil: worsening health inequities?巴西法院的健康权：加剧的健康不平等？
Health Hum Rights. 2009;11(2):33-45.
Zotero 插件