Sutherland Steve
Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112.
Evolution. 1986 Jan;40(1):117-128. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb05723.x.
Fruit-set values for 447 species of plants were examined for variations due to compatibility, breeding system, life form, latitude, type of fruit, and type of pollination. The results indicate significant differences between self-compatible and self-incompatible species in terms of 1) average fruit-set and 2) the effect of the independent variables. Breeding system, life form, and latitude were found to be the only significant independent variables for self-incompatible species, while fruit type and latitude were found to be significant for self-compatible plants. Although latitude was a significant variable for self-compatible and self-incompatible species, it was correlated with other variables and may actually have no direct effect on fruit-flower ratios in plants. Hypotheses explaining the effect of the significant independent variables on fruit-flower ratios were then examined and, when possible, predictions were tested. The results indicate that the selective-abortion and bet-hedging hypotheses may be important factors contributing to the low fruit-set in self-incompatible plants, while the male-function hypothesis may explain the lower fruit-flower ratios in hermaphrodites.
对447种植物的坐果率进行了研究,以考察其因亲和性、繁殖系统、生活型、纬度、果实类型和授粉类型而产生的变化。结果表明,自交亲和与自交不亲和物种在以下两方面存在显著差异:1)平均坐果率;2)自变量的影响。研究发现,对于自交不亲和物种,繁殖系统、生活型和纬度是仅有的显著自变量,而对于自交亲和植物,果实类型和纬度是显著的。虽然纬度对于自交亲和与自交不亲和物种都是一个显著变量,但它与其他变量相关,实际上可能对植物的果花比没有直接影响。随后对解释显著自变量对果花比影响的假说进行了考察,并在可能的情况下对预测进行了检验。结果表明,选择性败育和风险分摊假说可能是导致自交不亲和植物坐果率低的重要因素,而雄性功能假说可能解释了雌雄同体植物较低的果花比。