Poor outcome reporting in medical research; building practice on spoilt grounds.
作者信息
Mantziari Styliani, Demartines Nicolas
机构信息
Department of Visceral Surgery and Transplantation, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
出版信息
Ann Transl Med. 2017 May;5(Suppl 1):S15. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.03.75.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Poor outcome reporting in medical research; building practice on spoilt grounds.医学研究中不良的结果报告：在有缺陷的基础上开展实践。
Ann Transl Med. 2017 May;5(Suppl 1):S15. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.03.75.
2
Exclusion on grounds of language ability--a reporting gap in health services research?基于语言能力的排除——卫生服务研究中的一个报告空白？
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007 Oct;12(4):205-8. doi: 10.1258/135581907782101642.
3
Spoilt for choice!选择太多，令人不知所措！
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Dec;23(7):807. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
4
Spoilt for choice?选择太多而不知所措？
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb 1;175(3):208-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200609-1377ED.
5
Letter: Spoilt films in x-ray departments and radiation exposure to the public from medical radiology.信：X光科室的胶片损坏以及医学放射对公众的辐射暴露
Br J Radiol. 1976 May;49(581):475-6. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-49-581-475.
6
PDE-5 inhibitors: spoilt for choice.5型磷酸二酯酶抑制剂：选择过多。
Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Aug;60(8):893-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01050.x.
7
Drugs for cardiovascular disease. Spoilt for choice?治疗心血管疾病的药物。选择太多了？
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 1997 Jul;6(7):915-8. doi: 10.1517/13543784.6.7.915.
8
[Resignation on medical grounds: family physicians insufficiently aware of the background].[因健康原因辞职：家庭医生对相关背景了解不足]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997 Apr 12;141(15):737-40.
9
Building bridges between research, policy and practice in public health.在公共卫生领域的研究、政策和实践之间架起桥梁。
Rev Saude Publica. 2011 Dec;45(6):1197-200. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102011000600023.
10
Spoilt films in x-ray departments.X光科室中的损坏胶片。
Br J Radiol. 1977 Mar;50(591):233-4. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-50-591-233.
引用本文的文献
1
Primary outcome reporting in clinical trials for older adults with depression.老年抑郁症患者临床试验中的主要结局报告
BJPsych Open. 2024 Mar 7;10(2):e60. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.650.
2
Immunotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: State-of-the Art in 2021.2021年食管癌免疫治疗：最新进展
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 22;14(3):554. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030554.
3
Metabolic side effects of antipsychotic drugs in individuals with schizophrenia during medium- to long-term treatment: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.抗精神病药物在精神分裂症个体中长期治疗中的代谢副作用：系统评价和网络荟萃分析的随机对照试验方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 2;10(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01760-z.
4
Outcome reporting recommendations for clinical trial protocols and reports: a scoping review.临床试验方案和报告结局报告建议：范围综述。
Trials. 2020 Jul 8;21(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04440-w.
5
Primary outcome reporting in adolescent depression clinical trials needs standardization.青少年抑郁症临床试验的主要结局报告需要标准化。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 25;20(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01019-6.
6
Improving outcome reporting in clinical trial reports and protocols: study protocol for the Instrument for reporting Planned Endpoints in Clinical Trials (InsPECT).改善临床试验报告和方案中的结果报告：临床试验计划终点报告工具（InsPECT）的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Mar 6;20(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3248-0.
本文引用的文献
1
Underreporting of Secondary Endpoints in Randomized Trials: Cross-sectional, Observational Study.随机试验中次要终点的报告不足：横断面观察性研究。
Ann Surg. 2016 Dec;264(6):982-986. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001573.
2
COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol).COS-STAR：核心结局集开发研究的报告指南（方案）
Trials. 2015 Aug 22;16:373. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0913-9.
3
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目（PRISMA-P）2015：详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
4
Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research.减少生物医学研究中不完整或无法使用的报告所造成的浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):267-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-X. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
5
Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review.系统评价研究发表偏倚和结果报告偏倚的实证证据——更新综述。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 5;8(7):e66844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066844. Print 2013.
6
A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature.系统评价卫生保健文献报告规范的依从性。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2013 May 6;6:169-88. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S43952. Print 2013.
7
Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider.制定临床试验核心结局集：需要考虑的问题。
Trials. 2012 Aug 6;13:132. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-132.
8
The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine.证据的级别及其在循证医学中的作用。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jul;128(1):305-310. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318219c171.
9
Registration of observational studies: is it time?观察性研究的注册：是时候了吗？
CMAJ. 2010 Oct 19;182(15):1638-42. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.092252. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
10
Registration of observational studies.观察性研究的注册
BMJ. 2010 Feb 18;340:c950. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c950.
Zotero 插件