Pamilo Pekka
Department of Genetics, University of Helsinki, Arkadiankatu 7, SF-00100, Helsinki, FINLAND.
Evolution. 1990 May;44(3):689-697. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05948.x.
Methods used for estimating the confidence levels of UPGMA-type phenograms based on molecular-genetic data are examined. The methods based on internodal variances or on bootstrapping over characters are compared by simulating a three-species phylogeny with a trifurcation. The bootstrap method seems slightly better in this comparison. Weighting of OTU's when constructing the phenogram is also examined. A method that weights each OTU according to the estimated independent evolutionary information, a modified WPGMA, appears slightly better than UPGMA in estimating the branching points and branch lengths. The methods are applied to the data on restriction sites in eight Hawaiian Drosophila species. The significance of the clusters among them differ from those reported earlier.
对基于分子遗传学数据估计UPGMA型系统树置信水平的方法进行了研究。通过模拟具有三分叉的三物种系统发育,比较了基于节点间方差或基于字符的自展法。在这种比较中,自展法似乎略胜一筹。还研究了构建系统树时对操作分类单元(OTU)的加权。一种根据估计的独立进化信息对每个OTU进行加权的方法,即改良的加权组平均法(WPGMA),在估计分支点和分支长度方面似乎比UPGMA略胜一筹。这些方法应用于八种夏威夷果蝇物种的限制性位点数据。它们之间聚类的显著性与早期报道的不同。