Sheck A L, Gould F
Department of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695-7613.
Evolution. 1996 Apr;50(2):831-841. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03892.x.
Two species of moths and their hybrids were studied to determine the genetic basis of host range. One species, Heliothis virescens (HV), has a broad host range and is an agricultural pest on cotton (Malvaceae), soybean (Fabaceae), and tobacco (Solanaceae). The other species, Heliothis subflexa (HS), has a narrow host range, feeding on plants in the genus Physalis (Solanaceae). Experiments were done to determine whether the abilities to feed on cotton, soybean, and tobacco were each under separate genetic control in HV (genetically uncorrelated) or whether feeding on all three hosts was genetically correlated. By repeatedly backcrossing hybrids to HS while selecting for high larval survival and weight on soybean, loci conferring the ability to feed on soybean were moved from HV into the genetic background of the specialist, HS. After six generations of selection on soybean we tested the selected line on soybean, cotton, Physalis, and tobacco to determine if ability to feed on soybean was correlated with feeding ability on these other hosts. We found no evidence to support the hypothesis that feeding on all three hosts was correlated and controlled by a single locus. Compared to HS, the survival and weight of the selected line were significantly higher on soybean, similar on tobacco and Physalis, and slightly, but not significantly, higher on cotton. We also conducted a behavioral choice test to determine if larval preference for soybean was correlated with preference for other hosts. The selected line larvae had higher preference for soybean and cotton than HS. Preference for tobacco was equal in the selected line and in HS. These results support the trends seen in survival and growth tests where performances on soybean and cotton appeared partially correlated and performances on soybean and tobacco were uncorrelated. In conclusion, the generalist, HV, did not have a single set of loci that governed feeding on soybean, cotton and tobacco. It is likely that some of the loci governing performance and preference for soybean also contributed to performance and preference for cotton and that the soybean loci examined did not interact negatively to lower performance and preference for Physalis, the specialist's host. This approach can be applied more widely to address evolutionary questions about host range and other ecological traits.
对两种蛾类及其杂交种进行了研究,以确定寄主范围的遗传基础。其中一种蛾类,烟芽夜蛾(HV),具有广泛的寄主范围,是棉花(锦葵科)、大豆(豆科)和烟草(茄科)的农业害虫。另一种蛾类,亚斜纹夜蛾(HS),寄主范围狭窄,以酸浆属(茄科)植物为食。开展了实验,以确定烟芽夜蛾取食棉花、大豆和烟草的能力是各自受独立的遗传控制(遗传不相关),还是取食所有这三种寄主在遗传上相关。通过让杂交种与亚斜纹夜蛾反复回交,同时在大豆上选择高幼虫存活率和体重,将赋予取食大豆能力的基因座从烟芽夜蛾转移到专食性物种亚斜纹夜蛾的遗传背景中。在大豆上经过六代选择后,我们在大豆、棉花、酸浆和烟草上对所选品系进行了测试,以确定取食大豆的能力是否与取食这些其他寄主的能力相关。我们没有找到证据支持取食所有这三种寄主在遗传上相关且由单个基因座控制的假说。与亚斜纹夜蛾相比,所选品系在大豆上的存活率和体重显著更高,在烟草和酸浆上相似,在棉花上略高但不显著。我们还进行了行为选择试验,以确定幼虫对大豆的偏好是否与对其他寄主的偏好相关。所选品系的幼虫对大豆和棉花的偏好高于亚斜纹夜蛾。所选品系和亚斜纹夜蛾对烟草的偏好相同。这些结果支持了在存活和生长试验中观察到的趋势,即大豆和棉花上的表现似乎部分相关,而大豆和烟草上的表现不相关。总之, 泛食性的烟芽夜蛾没有一组单一的基因座来控制其对大豆、棉花和烟草的取食。控制大豆表现和偏好的一些基因座可能也对棉花的表现和偏好有贡献,并且所检测的大豆基因座并没有产生负面相互作用来降低对专食性物种的寄主酸浆的表现和偏好。这种方法可以更广泛地应用于解决关于寄主范围和其他生态特征的进化问题。